Selmer Kaja K, Brandal Kristin, Olstad Ole K, Birkenes Bård, Undlien Dag E, Egeland Thore
Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Biomol Screen. 2009 Jan;14(1):92-6. doi: 10.1177/1087057108327327.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have recently replaced microsatellites as the genetic markers of choice in linkage analysis, primarily because they are more abundant and the genotypes more amenable for automatic calling. One of the most recently launched linkage mapping sets (LMS) is the Applied Biosystems Human LMS 4K, which is a genome-wide linkage set based on the SNPlex technology and the use of clustered SNPs. In this article the authors report on their experience with this set and the associated genotyping software GeneMapper version 4.0, which they have used for linkage analyses in 17 moderate to large families with assumed monogenic disease. For comparison of methods, they also performed a genome-wide linkage analysis in 1 of the 17 families using the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 10K 2.0 array. The conclusion is that both methods performed technically well, with high call rates and comparable and low rates of Mendelian inconsistencies. However, genotyping is less automated in GeneMapper version 4.0 than in the Affymetrix software and thus more time consuming.
单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)最近已取代微卫星,成为连锁分析中首选的遗传标记,主要是因为它们数量更多,且基因型更便于自动分型。最近推出的连锁图谱集(LMS)之一是应用生物系统公司的人类LMS 4K,它是基于SNPlex技术和聚类SNP的全基因组连锁图谱集。在本文中,作者报告了他们使用该图谱集及相关基因分型软件GeneMapper 4.0版本的经验,他们已将其用于17个假定为单基因疾病的中大型家系的连锁分析。为了比较方法,他们还使用Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping 10K 2.0芯片对17个家系中的1个进行了全基因组连锁分析。结论是,两种方法在技术上都表现良好,分型成功率高,孟德尔不一致率相当且较低。然而,GeneMapper 4.0版本的基因分型自动化程度低于Affymetrix软件,因此耗时更长。