Suppr超能文献

健康受试者在静息和进行腹部收紧运动时的腹部肌肉大小和对称性。

Abdominal muscle size and symmetry at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in healthy control subjects.

机构信息

Spine Center Division, Department of Research and Development, Schulthess Klinik, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Anat. 2008 Aug;213(2):173-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2008.00946.x.

Abstract

The symmetry of, and physical characteristics influencing, the thickness of the lateral abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal exercises were examined in 57 healthy subjects (20 men, 37 women; aged 22-62 years). M-mode ultrasound images were recorded from the abdominal muscles at rest and during abdominal hollowing exercises in hook-lying. The fascial lines bordering the transvs. abdominis, obliquus internus and obliquus externus were digitized and the absolute thickness, relative thickness (% of total lateral thickness) and contraction ratio (thickness during hollowing/thickness at rest), as well as the asymmetry (difference between sides expressed as a percent of the smallest value for the two sides) for each of these parameters were determined for each muscle. Both at rest and during hollowing, obliquus internus was the thickest and transvs. abdominis the thinnest muscle. There were no significant differences between left and right sides for group mean thicknesses of any muscle; however, individual asymmetries were evident, with mean values for the different muscles ranging from 11% to 26%; asymmetry was much less for the contraction ratios (mean % side differences, 5-14% depending on muscle). Body mass was the most significant positive predictor of absolute muscle thickness, for all muscles at rest and during hollowing, accounting for 30-44% variance. Body mass index explained 20-30% variance in transvs. abdominis contraction ratio (negative relationship). The influence of these confounders must be considered in comparative studies of healthy controls and back pain patients, unless groups are very carefully matched. Asymmetries observed in patients should be interpreted with caution, as they are also common in healthy subjects.

摘要

本研究调查了 57 名健康受试者(20 名男性,37 名女性;年龄 22-62 岁)在休息和进行腹部锻炼时,侧腹肌厚度的对称性和影响其厚度的物理特性。在钩卧位进行腹部内凹运动时,从腹部肌肉记录 M 模式超声图像。数字化腹横肌、内斜肌和外斜肌筋膜线,并确定每个参数的绝对厚度、相对厚度(占总外侧厚度的百分比)和收缩比(内凹时的厚度/休息时的厚度),以及这些参数的每个肌肉的不对称性(两侧之间的差异表示为两侧中最小值的百分比)。在休息和内凹时,内斜肌最厚,腹横肌最薄。任何肌肉的组平均值厚度左右两侧均无显著差异;然而,存在明显的个体不对称性,不同肌肉的平均值范围为 11%至 26%;收缩比的不对称性(取决于肌肉,平均%侧差异为 5-14%)要小得多。体重是所有肌肉在休息和内凹时绝对肌肉厚度的最显著正预测因子,占 30-44%的方差。体重指数解释了腹横肌收缩比 20-30%的方差(负相关)。在比较健康对照组和腰痛患者时,必须考虑这些混杂因素的影响,除非两组非常仔细匹配。在健康受试者中也很常见,因此应谨慎解释患者中观察到的不对称性。

相似文献

5
Lateral abdominal muscle size at rest and during abdominal drawing-in manoeuvre in healthy adolescents.
Man Ther. 2015 Feb;20(1):117-23. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
8
Measurement of superficial and deep abdominal muscle thickness: an ultrasonography study.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2016 Aug 23;35(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40101-016-0106-6.
9
Morphology of the abdominal muscles in ballet dancers with and without low back pain: a magnetic resonance imaging study.
J Sci Med Sport. 2014 Sep;17(5):452-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Physiotherapists' reliability of inter-recti distance measurement with real-time ultrasound across a mixed women population sample.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251361999. doi: 10.1177/17455057251361999. Epub 2025 Aug 12.
2
Assessment of Lateral Abdominal Muscle Activation Asymmetry via M-mode Ultrasonography.
Cureus. 2024 Apr 3;16(4):e57563. doi: 10.7759/cureus.57563. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
The core of performance in adolescent cricket pace bowlers: Trunk muscle stability, maybe, but not strength-endurance and thickness.
S Afr J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 1;34(1):v34i1a12521. doi: 10.17159/2078-516X/2022/v34i1a12521. eCollection 2022.
6
Internal and External Oblique Muscle Asymmetry in Sprint Hurdlers and Sprinters: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Sports Sci Med. 2022 Feb 15;21(1):120-126. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2022.120. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Muscle Thickness During Core Stability Exercises in Children and Adults.
J Hum Kinet. 2020 Jan 31;71:131-144. doi: 10.2478/hukin-2019-0079. eCollection 2020 Jan.

本文引用的文献

1
Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part I: Theory.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 1992 Feb;7(1):19-26. doi: 10.1016/0268-0033(92)90003-M.
3
Ultrasound imaging as a feedback tool in the rehabilitation of trunk muscle dysfunction for people with low back pain.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Oct;37(10):627-34. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2555.
4
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Aug;37(8):450-66. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.2558.
5
Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging: the roadmap ahead.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2007 Aug;37(8):431-3. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2007.0107.
7
Abdominal muscle size and symmetry in normal subjects.
Muscle Nerve. 2006 Sep;34(3):320-6. doi: 10.1002/mus.20589.
8
Specific stabilisation exercise for spinal and pelvic pain: a systematic review.
Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):79-88. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70043-5.
9
Relationships among lateral abdominal muscles, gender, body mass index, and hand dominance.
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006 May;36(5):289-97. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2006.2217.
10
An MRI investigation into the function of the transversus abdominis muscle during "drawing-in" of the abdominal wall.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Mar 15;31(6):E175-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000202740.86338.df.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验