Taxiarchopoulos Nikolaos, Drakonaki Elena, Gianniotis Maria, Matzaroglou Charalampos, Tsepis Elias, Billis Evdokia
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Patras, 26504 Rion, Greece.
Medical School, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 11;11(10):1396. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101396.
It is believed that ultrasound-guided imaging of activation/contraction of the deep abdominal muscles (such as transervsus abdominis) is useful for assisting deep muscle re-education, which is often dysfunctional in non-specific low back pain (NSLBP). Thus, this pilot study aimed to evaluate the use of real-time ultrasound (US) as a feedback device for transverse abdominis (TrA) activation/contraction during an exercise program in chronic NSLBP patients. Twenty-three chronic NSLBP patients were recruited and randomly assigned to a US-guided ( = 12, 8 women, 47.6 ± 2.55 years) or control group ( = 11, 9 women, 46.9 ± 4.29 years). The same motor control-based exercise program was applied to both groups. All patients received physiotherapy twice per week for seven weeks. Outcome measures, tested at baseline and post-intervention, included Numeric Pain Rating Scale, TrA activation level (measured through a pressure biofeedback unit-based developed protocol), seven established motor control tests, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. For each group, all outcome variables yielded statistical differences post-intervention ( < 0.05), indicating significant improvements. However, there were no significant group x time interactions for any of the outcomes ( > 0.05), thus, indicating no superiority of the US-guided group over the control. The addition of US as a visual feedback device for TrA re-education during a motor control exercise program was not proven superior to traditional physiotherapy.
据信,超声引导下对腹部深层肌肉(如腹横肌)激活/收缩的成像有助于辅助深层肌肉再训练,而在非特异性下腰痛(NSLBP)中,深层肌肉往往功能失调。因此,这项初步研究旨在评估实时超声(US)作为慢性NSLBP患者运动计划中腹横肌(TrA)激活/收缩的反馈装置的用途。招募了23名慢性NSLBP患者,并将他们随机分为超声引导组(n = 12,8名女性,47.6±2.55岁)或对照组(n = 11,9名女性,46.9±4.29岁)。两组都采用相同的基于运动控制的运动计划。所有患者每周接受两次物理治疗,共七周。在基线和干预后进行测试的结果指标包括数字疼痛评分量表、TrA激活水平(通过基于压力生物反馈单元开发的方案测量)、七项既定的运动控制测试、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷和医院焦虑抑郁量表。对于每组,所有结果变量在干预后均产生统计学差异(P < 0.05),表明有显著改善。然而,对于任何结果,均无显著的组×时间交互作用(P > 0.05),因此,表明超声引导组并不优于对照组。在运动控制锻炼计划中,添加超声作为TrA再训练的视觉反馈装置并未被证明优于传统物理治疗。