Klimek Katarzyna M
Z Zakładu Statystyki Katedry Analizy Instrumentalnej, Slaskiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego w Katowicach.
Wiad Lek. 2008;61(7-9):211-5.
In order to define completely the mining of significant test it is essential to have the knowledge of test's statistical power. We intuit that when two tests are performed it is the one with a bigger power that is preferable. It means that when two tests have the same sample size and the same significance level a, better is the one which rejects the false null hypothesis more often. When planning the empirical scientific research it is cardinal to know how big the effect must be and what level of power of statistical test has to be achieved to be satisfied with the overall outcome. Four versions of power analysis are being presented. They are accessible in Power Analysis procedure of STATISTICA software. The analysis of statistical power supports one of the most severe problems in clinical research such as exposing objects of the study to the risk of injury, unpleasantness and inconvenience during the experiment. It happens that when scientist try to draw a particular clinical conclusion too little data are taken into account and the risk of receiving false negative results is getting higher. The opposite situation appears when in order to justify the outcome of the experiment too many data are taken which leads to false positive results.
为了完全定义显著检验的挖掘,了解检验的统计功效至关重要。我们凭直觉认为,当进行两项检验时,功效更大的那个检验更可取。这意味着当两项检验具有相同的样本量和相同的显著性水平α时,更优的检验是更频繁地拒绝错误原假设的那个。在规划实证科学研究时,关键是要知道效应必须有多大,以及要达到何种统计检验功效水平才能对总体结果感到满意。这里介绍了四种功效分析版本。它们可在STATISTICA软件的功效分析程序中获取。统计功效分析支持临床研究中最严峻的问题之一,比如在实验过程中使研究对象面临受伤、不适和不便的风险。情况往往是,当科学家试图得出特定的临床结论时,考虑的数据过少,从而获得假阴性结果的风险就会增加。而当为了证明实验结果而纳入过多数据时,则会出现相反的情况,即导致假阳性结果。