Chen Yu-Yen, Chu Dachen, Chou Pesus
Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Ophthalmology, Yang-Ming University Hospital, Ilan County, Taiwan.
Community Medicine Research Center and Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan; Taipei City Hospital, Zhongxing Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 17;10(2):e0118811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118811. eCollection 2015.
To distinguish the frequently misdiagnosed plateau iris eyes from pupillary block group and normal group, we compared the ocular biometrical parameters of them by A-scan ultrasongraphy.
In total, we retrospectively reviewed general characteristics and ocular findings including ocular biometric measurements of 71 normal, 39 plateau iris, and 83 pupillary block eyes.
The normal controls, plateau iris group and pupillary block group were significantly different in age, but not in gender. The anterior chamber depth tended to decrease and the lens thickness tended to increase from normal to plateau iris to pupillary block eyes. Compared to those of plateau iris group, the pupillary block group had significantly shallower anterior chamber depth (2.90mm vs. 2.33mm; p<0.001), thicker lens (4.77mm vs. 5.11mm; p<0.001), shorter axial length (23.16mm vs. 22.63mm; p<0.001), smaller relative lens position (2.28 vs. 2.16; p<0.001) and larger lens/axial length factor (2.06 vs. 2.26; p<0.001). However, when comparing plateau iris and normal eyes, only axial length and lens/axial length factor were significantly different (23.16 vs. 23.54; p<0.05 and 2.06 vs. 1.96; p<0.05).
Measured by A-scan ultrasonography, the ocular biometrics of plateau iris were significantly different from those of pupillary block eyes. However, our A-scan ultrasongraphy generally found no significant biometric differences between plateau iris and normal eyes. These findings suggest that while A-scan ultrasonography might be used as a practical tool for differentiating plateau iris and papillary block eyes, a more meticulous gonioscopy and other assessments may be necessary to distinguish plateau iris from normal eyes.
为了将常被误诊的高褶虹膜型青光眼与瞳孔阻滞组和正常组区分开来,我们通过A超超声检查比较了它们的眼生物测量参数。
我们总共回顾性分析了71例正常眼、39例高褶虹膜型青光眼和83例瞳孔阻滞眼的一般特征和眼部检查结果,包括眼生物测量。
正常对照组、高褶虹膜型青光眼组和瞳孔阻滞组在年龄上有显著差异,但在性别上无差异。从前房深度和晶状体厚度来看,从正常眼到高褶虹膜型青光眼再到瞳孔阻滞眼,前房深度有降低趋势,晶状体厚度有增加趋势。与高褶虹膜型青光眼组相比,瞳孔阻滞组的前房深度明显更浅(2.90mm对2.33mm;p<0.001),晶状体更厚(4.77mm对5.11mm;p<0.001),眼轴长度更短(23.16mm对22.63mm;p<0.001),相对晶状体位置更小(2.28对2.16;p<0.001),晶状体/眼轴长度系数更大(2.06对2.26;p<0.001)。然而,当比较高褶虹膜型青光眼和正常眼时,只有眼轴长度和晶状体/眼轴长度系数有显著差异(23.16对23.54;p<0.05和2.06对1.96;p<0.05)。
通过A超超声检查测量,高褶虹膜型青光眼的眼生物测量参数与瞳孔阻滞眼有显著差异。然而,我们的A超超声检查通常发现高褶虹膜型青光眼和正常眼之间没有显著的生物测量差异。这些发现表明,虽然A超超声检查可能用作区分高褶虹膜型青光眼和瞳孔阻滞眼的实用工具,但可能需要更细致的前房角镜检查和其他评估来区分高褶虹膜型青光眼和正常眼。