Zhang Guo-qing, Han Feng, Sun Wei, Pang Zuo-liang, SiKanDaer A BuLiZi, Wang Hong-jiang
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 Nov;30(11):858-62.
To investigate the safety, feasibility and the impact of different extents of lymph node dissection on the survival in the patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
From January 2001 to December 2006, 122 patients with locally advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma underwent radical resection through cervical, thoracic, and abdominal incisions, and were randomly divided into two-field lymph node dissection group (Two-FD) and three-field lymph node dissection group (Three-FD). Life-table method was used to compare the difference of survival rates between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the cumulative survival time and median survival time between the two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox model to identify the prognostic factors affecting the survival (alpha = 0.05).
There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, and disease stage. Postoperative complication rate and perioperative mortality rate were 14.5% and 1.6% in the two-FD group versus 15.0% and 1.7% in the three-FD group, statistically without a significant difference (P > 0.05). The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 78.2%, 39.6% and 14.5% in the two-FD group, and 83.7%, 42.4% and 18.1% in the three-FD group, respectively. The median survival time was 24.0 months in the two-FD group and 31.0 months in the three-FD group. Log-rank analysis showed that in the patients without preoperative weight loss, in T3N1M0 stage, only single regional lymph node metastasis but < 3 in total, the three field lymph node dissection achieved a better prognosis (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis using Cox model showed that T and N stages and lymph node dissection extent were still risk factors in patients with stage III locally advanced thoracic esophageal carcinoma.
Compared with the two field lymph node dissection, the three field lymph node dissection is safe and feasible, and can improve the survival for a part of stage III esophageal cancer patients without increase in operative mortality and complications.
探讨局部晚期胸段食管癌患者不同范围淋巴结清扫的安全性、可行性及其对生存的影响。
2001年1月至2006年12月,122例局部晚期胸段食管癌患者经颈、胸、腹三切口行根治性切除,并随机分为二野淋巴结清扫组(二野组)和三野淋巴结清扫组(三野组)。采用寿命表法比较两组生存率的差异。采用Kaplan-Meier法比较两组的累积生存时间和中位生存时间。使用Cox模型进行多因素分析以确定影响生存的预后因素(α = 0.05)。
两组在年龄、性别和疾病分期方面无显著差异。二野组术后并发症发生率和围手术期死亡率分别为14.5%和1.6%,三野组分别为15.0%和1.7%,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。二野组1年、3年和5年生存率分别为78.2%、39.6%和14.5%,三野组分别为83.7%、42.4%和18.1%。二野组中位生存时间为24.0个月,三野组为31.0个月。Log-rank分析显示,在无术前体重减轻、T3N1M0期、仅单个区域淋巴结转移但总数<3个的患者中,三野淋巴结清扫预后较好(P < 0.05)。使用Cox模型进行的多因素分析显示,T和N分期以及淋巴结清扫范围仍是Ⅲ期局部晚期胸段食管癌患者的危险因素。
与二野淋巴结清扫相比,三野淋巴结清扫安全可行,可提高部分Ⅲ期食管癌患者的生存率,且不增加手术死亡率和并发症。