• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多相对比剂注射以提高功能CT中参数估计的精度。

Multiphasic contrast injection for improved precision of parameter estimates in functional CT.

作者信息

Kim S M, Cho Y B, Haider M A, Milosevic M, Yeung I W T

机构信息

Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5921-33. doi: 10.1118/1.3021138.

DOI:10.1118/1.3021138
PMID:19175147
Abstract

Contrast injection protocol is known to affect the estimation of kinetic parameters in functional CT. A novel method is proposed to maximize the precision of parameter estimates by modulating the contrast injection scheme. The method models the intravenous contrast bolus to be dispersed by a "patient function" to give rise to the arterial input function, which, in turn, carries the contrast agent to tissue leading to contrast enhancement. The covariance matrix analysis was applied to calculate the uncertainty of parameter estimates as the coefficients of variation (CV) in the adiabatic tissue homogeneity (ATH), two-compartment, and the modified Kety model in which tumor pathophysiology is modeled. An optimization scheme was used to determine the optimal injection protocol which would minimize the CV of a particular kinetic parameter. For clinical utility, a recommended injection protocol was suggested from a statistical analysis with the optimal injection protocols obtained from the first group of 12 patients with cervix cancer. The efficacy of the recommended injection protocol was tested with a second group of 12 patients. In addition, the robustness of the recommended injection protocol to longitudinal study has been investigated in the presence of variations in arterial input function and tumor pathophysiology. Based on the data of the second group of patients, and using the ATH model, the recommended biphasic injection of two boluses improves the precision in the estimation of blood flow and mean transit time (MTT), by 36.9% and 38.4%, respectively, compared to the standard uniphasic injection protocol in the CV. However, measurement of the permeability surface area product and extravascular extracellular space volume favors a single fast bolus of the same contrast amount. The two-compartment model and the modified Kety model also benefited from the single fast bolus. The effect of variation in the arterial input function and tumor pathophysiology on the applicability of the recommended injection was also investigated. Based on computer simulation for a range of variations in the arterial input function and pathophysiology, the recommended biphasic injection was found to improve the precision in blood flow and MTT estimates by 31.4% and 36.5% on average, respectively, compared to the uniphasic injection.

摘要

已知对比剂注射方案会影响功能CT中动力学参数的估计。本文提出了一种新方法,通过调整对比剂注射方案来最大化参数估计的精度。该方法将静脉注射对比剂团注建模为由“患者函数”分散,从而产生动脉输入函数,进而将对比剂输送到组织导致对比增强。应用协方差矩阵分析来计算参数估计的不确定性,以绝热组织均匀性(ATH)、双室模型和模拟肿瘤病理生理学的改良凯蒂模型中的变异系数(CV)表示。采用优化方案来确定最佳注射方案,该方案可使特定动力学参数的CV最小化。为了临床应用,通过对第一组12例宫颈癌患者获得的最佳注射方案进行统计分析,提出了一种推荐注射方案。用第二组12例患者测试了推荐注射方案的疗效。此外,还研究了在动脉输入函数和肿瘤病理生理学存在变异的情况下,推荐注射方案对纵向研究的稳健性。基于第二组患者的数据,并使用ATH模型,与标准单相注射方案相比,推荐的双相注射两剂团注在估计血流和平均通过时间(MTT)时,CV分别提高了约36.9%和38.4%。然而,对于通透表面积乘积和血管外细胞外间隙体积的测量,相同对比剂用量的单次快速团注更有利。双室模型和改良凯蒂模型也受益于单次快速团注。还研究了动脉输入函数和肿瘤病理生理学变异对推荐注射适用性的影响。基于对一系列动脉输入函数和病理生理学变异的计算机模拟,发现与单相注射相比,推荐的双相注射平均分别将血流和MTT估计的精度提高了31.4%和36.5%。

相似文献

1
Multiphasic contrast injection for improved precision of parameter estimates in functional CT.多相对比剂注射以提高功能CT中参数估计的精度。
Med Phys. 2008 Dec;35(12):5921-33. doi: 10.1118/1.3021138.
2
Interindividual variability of arterial impulse response to intravenous injection of nonionic contrast agent (Iohexol) in DCE-CT study.在 DCE-CT 研究中,静脉注射非离子型对比剂(碘海醇)时动脉脉冲响应的个体间变异性。
Med Phys. 2009 Oct;36(10):4791-802. doi: 10.1118/1.3224495.
3
Dynamic contrast-enhanced CT of head and neck tumors: perfusion measurements using a distributed-parameter tracer kinetic model. Initial results and comparison with deconvolution-based analysis.头颈部肿瘤的动态对比增强CT:使用分布式参数示踪剂动力学模型进行灌注测量。初步结果及与基于去卷积分析的比较。
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Oct 21;52(20):6181-96. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/20/007. Epub 2007 Oct 1.
4
A method for patient dose reduction in dynamic contrast enhanced CT study.一种用于动态对比增强 CT 研究中降低患者剂量的方法。
Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):5094-103. doi: 10.1118/1.3622611.
5
Improved accuracy of quantitative parameter estimates in dynamic contrast-enhanced CT study with low temporal resolution.在低时间分辨率的动态对比增强CT研究中提高定量参数估计的准确性。
Med Phys. 2016 Jan;43(1):388. doi: 10.1118/1.4937600.
6
Primary colorectal cancer: use of kinetic modeling of dynamic contrast-enhanced CT data to predict clinical outcome.原发性结直肠癌:使用动态对比增强 CT 数据的动力学建模来预测临床结果。
Radiology. 2013 Apr;267(1):145-54. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120186. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
7
Split-bolus spectral multidetector CT of the pancreas: assessment of radiation dose and tumor conspicuity.胰腺的分次团注光谱多排 CT:评估辐射剂量和肿瘤显影度。
Radiology. 2013 Oct;269(1):139-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13121409. Epub 2013 May 14.
8
Intravascular functional maps of common neurovascular lesions derived from volumetric 4D CT data.从容积 4D CT 数据得出的常见神经血管病变的血管内功能图。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Jul;45(7):370-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181e1939d.
9
Tracer kinetic model selection for dynamic contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging of prostate cancer.用于前列腺癌动态对比增强 CT 成像的示踪剂动力学模型选择。
Invest Radiol. 2012 Jan;47(1):41-8. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31821c0ea7.
10
CT imaging of angiogenesis.血管生成的CT成像
Q J Nucl Med. 2003 Sep;47(3):171-87.

引用本文的文献

1
A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.模型约束的蒙特卡罗方法用于动态对比增强 MRI 中的盲动脉输入函数估计:I. 模拟。
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Aug 21;55(16):4783-806. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/011. Epub 2010 Aug 3.