Nicholls S, Hankins M, Hooley C, Smith H
Division of Public Health and Primary Care, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009 May;23(5):566-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.03017.x. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
Better information promotes sun protection behaviour and is associated with earlier presentation and survival for malignant melanoma. Aim To assess the quality of patient information leaflets about skin cancer and sun-protective behaviour available from general practices and community pharmacies.
A structured review of patient information leaflets. Setting All community pharmacies and general practices in one Primary Care Trust were invited to supply leaflets.
Readability was assessed using the SMOG scoring system. Presentation and content were reviewed using the Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) guidelines. Three consultant dermatologists assessed each leaflet for accuracy.
Thirty-one different patient information leaflets were returned. Thirteen (42%) were published in the previous 2 years, but 10 (32%) were over 5 years old. Nine (29%) leaflets were produced by the NHS or Health Education Authority, and 8 (27%) were linked to a commercial organization. One leaflet had readability in the primary education range (SMOG score = 6), and none with the recommended range for health education material (SMOG score < or = 5). Two leaflets (6%) were in the highest quartile of EQIP score for presentation and content. Five leaflets (17%) had a major inaccuracy such as over-reliance on sun screen products instead of shade and clothing.
Leaflets were of variable quality in presentation and content. All required a reading age higher than recommended. All leaflets with major inaccuracies had links with commercial organizations. This study raises important issues about the potential conflict between marketing and health messages in the way sun creams are promoted.
更完善的信息可促进防晒行为,且与恶性黑色素瘤的早期就诊及生存相关。目的:评估从全科医疗诊所和社区药房获取的有关皮肤癌及防晒行为的患者信息手册的质量。
对患者信息手册进行结构化审查。研究地点:邀请了某初级医疗信托基金辖区内的所有社区药房和全科医疗诊所提供手册。
使用烟雾量表评分系统评估可读性。依据“确保患者获得优质信息”(EQIP)指南对手册的呈现方式和内容进行审查。三位皮肤科顾问医生评估每份手册的准确性。
共收回31种不同的患者信息手册。其中13份(42%)是过去两年内出版的,但10份(32%)已超过5年。9份(29%)手册由英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)或健康教育管理局制作,8份(27%)与商业机构有关联。一份手册的可读性处于小学教育水平范围(烟雾量表评分 = 6),没有一份符合健康教育材料推荐的范围(烟雾量表评分≤5)。两份手册(6%)在呈现方式和内容方面的EQIP评分处于最高四分位数。五份手册(17%)存在重大错误,例如过度依赖防晒产品而非遮阳处和衣物。
手册在呈现方式和内容方面质量参差不齐。所有手册所需的阅读年龄均高于推荐水平。所有存在重大错误的手册都与商业机构有关联。本研究提出了关于防晒霜推广中营销与健康信息之间潜在冲突的重要问题。