• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后直肠系膜质量 - 西班牙审核教学计划的结果。

Quality of mesorectum after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer - results of an audited teaching programme in Spain.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge, 08907 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;12(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01720.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01720.x
PMID:19175653
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective observational study was to compare the quality of total mesorectal excision between laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal cancer.

METHOD

In April 2006, the Spanish Association of Surgeons started an audited teaching programme. The project was similar to the Norwegian one and several training courses were arranged. Patients were classified into two groups: laparoscopic rectal resection (LR) and open rectal resection (OR). The quality of the mesorectum was scored: complete, nearly complete or incomplete. The circumferential margin (CRM) was considered positive, if tumour was located 1 mm or less from the surface of the specimen.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2008, 604 patients underwent rectal resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: 209 patients were included in the LR group and 395 patients in the OR group. There were no differences in terms of number of lymph nodes affected, distance of the tumour from CRM. The mesorectum was complete in 464 (76.8%), nearly complete in 91 (15.1%) and incomplete in 49 patients (8.1%). CRM was negative in 534 patients (88.4%). No differences were observed between the two groups. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 38.8% in LR group and 44.6% in OR group (P = 0.170). Overall postoperative mortality rate was 2.5%. One patient died (0.5%) in the LR group and 14 patients died (3.5%) in the OR group (P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer is feasible with the quality of mesorectal excision and postoperative outcomes similar to those of open surgery.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性观察研究旨在比较腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌全系膜切除术的质量。

方法

2006 年 4 月,西班牙外科医师协会开始了一项审核教学计划。该项目与挪威的项目类似,并安排了几轮培训课程。患者被分为两组:腹腔镜直肠切除术(LR)和开腹直肠切除术(OR)。直肠系膜的质量评分如下:完全、接近完全或不完全。如果肿瘤位于标本表面 1 毫米或以内,则环周切缘(CRM)被认为是阳性。

结果

2006 年至 2008 年间,604 例接受直肠癌全系膜切除术的直肠癌患者接受了直肠切除术:209 例患者纳入 LR 组,395 例患者纳入 OR 组。两组在受影响的淋巴结数量、肿瘤与 CRM 的距离方面无差异。464 例(76.8%)的直肠系膜完全,91 例(15.1%)的直肠系膜接近完全,49 例(8.1%)的直肠系膜不完全。534 例(88.4%)的 CRM 为阴性。两组间无差异。LR 组术后总发病率为 38.8%,OR 组为 44.6%(P=0.170)。总的术后死亡率为 2.5%。LR 组有 1 例患者(0.5%)死亡,OR 组有 14 例患者(3.5%)死亡(P=0.021)。

结论

腹腔镜直肠癌切除术是可行的,其系膜切除质量和术后结果与开腹手术相似。

相似文献

1
Quality of mesorectum after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer - results of an audited teaching programme in Spain.腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后直肠系膜质量 - 西班牙审核教学计划的结果。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;12(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01720.x.
2
Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.直肠癌全直肠系膜切除质量与环周切缘深度:前20例机器人手术病例的配对比较
Colorectal Dis. 2014 Aug;16(8):603-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12634.
3
Meta-analysis of the impact of surgical approach on the grade of mesorectal excision in rectal cancer.直肠癌系膜切除程度中手术入路影响的荟萃分析
Br J Surg. 2017 Nov;104(12):1609-1619. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10664.
4
The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.环周切缘状态:机器人辅助、腹腔镜及开放全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的比较
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;42(6):808-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
5
Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision vs Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Low and Middle Rectal Cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Jul;61(7):809-816. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001063.
6
Commentary: Rectal cancer patients are often not suitable for laparoscopic surgery.评论:直肠癌患者通常不适合进行腹腔镜手术。
Colorectal Dis. 2010 Jan;12(1):31-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02040.x.
7
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: A meta-analysis.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的短期临床疗效比较:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;42(12):1841-1850. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Laparoscopic low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.腹腔镜低位前切除术联合全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌
Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 Mar-Apr;59(114):405-8. doi: 10.5754/hge11470.
9
[Rectal cancer within 10 cm. Comparison of the radicality of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques with regard to the circumferential resection margin and the completeness of mesorectal excision].[距肛缘10厘米以内的直肠癌。腹腔镜与开放手术技术在环周切缘及直肠系膜切除完整性方面的根治性比较]
Rozhl Chir. 2013 Jun;92(6):312-9.
10
Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant treatment: targeting sphincter-preserving surgery.新辅助治疗后直肠癌的腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术:以保留括约肌手术为目标
Hepatogastroenterology. 2011 Sep-Oct;58(110-111):1545-54. doi: 10.5754/hge11114. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Laparoscopy is non-inferior to open surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜手术与开放手术治疗直肠癌的非劣效性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(13):e7363. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7363.
2
Review of incomplete macroscopic resections (R2) in rectal cancer: Treatment, prognosis and future perspectives.直肠癌不完全宏观切除(R2)的综述:治疗、预后及未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Sep 15;13(9):1062-1072. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1062.
3
Pelvic exenterations for primary rectal cancer: Analysis from a 10-year national prospective database.
原发性直肠癌盆腔廓清术:来自 10 年全国前瞻性数据库的分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec 7;24(45):5144-5153. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i45.5144.
4
Two-stage Turnbull-Cutait pull-through coloanal anastomosis versus coloanal anastomosis with protective loop ileostomy for low rectal cancer. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial (Turnbull-BCN).两阶段Turnbull-Cutait经腹会阴拉出式结肠肛管吻合术与带保护性回肠造口术的结肠肛管吻合术治疗低位直肠癌。一项随机对照试验(Turnbull-BCN)的方案
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1357-1362. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2842-4. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
5
Learning curve in robotic rectal cancer surgery: current state of affairs.机器人直肠癌手术的学习曲线:现状
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Dec;31(12):1807-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00384-016-2660-0. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Update on advances and controversy in rectal cancer treatment.直肠癌治疗的进展与争议最新情况
Tech Coloproctol. 2016 Mar;20(3):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s10151-015-1418-y. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
7
Predicting the pathological features of the mesorectum before the laparoscopic approach to rectal cancer.在直肠癌腹腔镜手术前预测直肠系膜的病理特征。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Dec;28(12):3458-66. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3622-7. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
8
Initial experience of a surgical fellow in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery under training protocol and supervision: comparison of short-term results for 70 early cases (under supervision) and 73 late cases (without supervision).外科住院医师在培训方案和监督下进行腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的初步经验:70 例早期病例(在监督下)和 73 例晚期病例(无监督)的短期结果比较。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Aug;27(8):2900-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2851-5. Epub 2013 Feb 23.
9
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: results of a prospective multicentre analysis of 4,970 patients.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的前瞻性多中心分析:4970 例患者的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jan;27(1):295-302. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2444-8. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
10
The Importance of the Pathologist's Role in Assessment of the Quality of the Mesorectum.病理学家在评估直肠系膜质量中的作用的重要性。
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2012 Jun;8(2):90-98. doi: 10.1007/s11888-012-0124-7. Epub 2012 Mar 27.