• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大体积(>60克)前列腺的管理:等离子体动力学超脉冲(双极)与传统(单极)经尿道前列腺切除术的比较

Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate.

作者信息

Bhansali Manish, Patankar Suresh, Dobhada Sayten, Khaladkar Suparn

机构信息

AMAI Trust's Institute of Urology, Pune, India.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):141-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0005.

DOI:10.1089/end.2007.0005
PMID:19178175
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Today, urologists around the world are encountering greater numbers of larger prostate glands, probably because of an initial trial of pharmacotherapy. The present study was performed to assess the safety and efficacy of bipolar transurethral resection of large prostate glands using the PlasmaKinetic (PK) Superpulse System.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This single-blind, randomized study included 70 patients with prostate gland >60 g seen on three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography. Patients were randomized 1:1 using envelopes into either a PK Superpulse transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) group or conventional TURP group, and underwent the procedure accordingly. Perioperative and postoperative parameters included operative time, blood loss, need for blood transfusion, clinical transurethral resection (TUR) syndrome, and duration of catheterization and hospitalization. Of 70 patients, 67 were followed for a minimum of 9 months, and data were analyzed using SPSS software.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable in terms of preoperative parameters, which included American Urological Association Symptom Score, Qmax, gland size, and postvoid residual. A statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in terms of perioperative blood loss, change in serum sodium, and duration of catheterization. These complications were significantly less in the PK Superpulse group, with an obvious reduction in the duration of hospitalization in that group.

CONCLUSION

The PK Superpulse System can be used as safely and effectively in the resection of the large gland (>60 g) as it has been reported to be in the resection of small and medium-sized glands. By using physiologic saline (0.9% NaCl) as irrigation fluid, it eliminates any danger of TUR syndrome and thus eliminates the conventional time limit of resection. PK Superpulse TURP is a promising treatment modality in the management of large prostate glands. It has all the features of gold-standard monopolar TURP, along with added safety and efficacy. It is ready to be included in the urologist's armamentarium.

摘要

背景与目的

如今,全球泌尿外科医生遇到的前列腺体积较大的患者数量增多,这可能是因为最初采用了药物治疗。本研究旨在评估使用等离子动态(PK)超脉冲系统进行双极经尿道大前列腺切除术的安全性和有效性。

患者与方法

这项单盲随机研究纳入了70例经三维经直肠超声检查前列腺体积>60 g的患者。使用信封法将患者按1:1随机分为PK超脉冲经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)组或传统TURP组,并相应地接受手术。围手术期和术后参数包括手术时间、失血量、输血需求、临床经尿道切除术(TUR)综合征以及导尿和住院时间。70例患者中,67例至少随访了9个月,并使用SPSS软件进行数据分析。

结果

两组在术前参数方面具有可比性,术前参数包括美国泌尿外科学会症状评分、最大尿流率、腺体大小和残余尿量。两组在围手术期失血量、血清钠变化和导尿时间方面存在统计学显著差异。PK超脉冲组的这些并发症明显更少,该组住院时间明显缩短。

结论

PK超脉冲系统在大腺体(>60 g)切除术中的使用与在中小腺体切除术中一样安全有效。通过使用生理盐水(0.9% NaCl)作为冲洗液,它消除了TUR综合征的任何风险,从而消除了传统的切除时间限制。PK超脉冲TURP是治疗大前列腺的一种有前景的治疗方式。它具有金标准单极TURP的所有特征,同时增加了安全性和有效性。它已准备好纳入泌尿外科医生的治疗手段。

相似文献

1
Management of large (>60 g) prostate gland: PlasmaKinetic Superpulse (bipolar) versus conventional (monopolar) transurethral resection of the prostate.大体积(>60克)前列腺的管理:等离子体动力学超脉冲(双极)与传统(单极)经尿道前列腺切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2009 Jan;23(1):141-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2007.0005.
2
PlasmaKinetic Superpulse transurethral resection versus conventional transurethral resection of prostate.等离子体动力学超脉冲经尿道前列腺切除术与传统经尿道前列腺切除术的比较
J Endourol. 2006 Mar;20(3):215-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2006.20.215.
3
Results from an international multicentre double-blind randomized controlled trial on the perioperative efficacy and safety of bipolar vs monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.国际多中心双盲随机对照试验研究双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术围手术期疗效和安全性的结果。
BJU Int. 2012 Jan;109(2):240-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10222.x. Epub 2011 May 9.
4
Gyrus bipolar versus standard monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial.双极与标准单极经尿道前列腺切除术:一项随机前瞻性试验
Urology. 2006 Jan;67(1):69-72. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.033.
5
Five-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial comparing bipolar plasmakinetic and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate.随机对照试验比较双极等离子体与单极经尿道前列腺切除术 5 年随访结果。
Yonsei Med J. 2012 Jul 1;53(4):734-41. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2012.53.4.734.
6
Transurethral resection of the prostate with a bipolar tissue management system compared to conventional monopolar resectoscope: one-year outcome.与传统单极电切镜相比,使用双极组织管理系统行经尿道前列腺切除术:一年随访结果
Yonsei Med J. 2006 Oct 31;47(5):715-20. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.5.715.
7
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of prostate: randomized controlled study.双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术:随机对照研究
J Endourol. 2005 Apr;19(3):333-8. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.333.
8
Conventional monopolar resection or bipolar resection in saline for the management of large (>60 g) benign prostatic hyperplasia: an evaluation of morbidity.在盐水中采用传统单极切除术或双极切除术治疗大体积(>60克)良性前列腺增生症:发病率评估
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2010 Aug;19(4):207-13. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2010.496963.
9
Vapor resection: a good alternative to standard loop resection in the management of prostates >40 cc.汽化切除术:对于处理体积大于40立方厘米的前列腺,是标准环形切除术的良好替代方法。
J Endourol. 2002 Dec;16(10):767-71. doi: 10.1089/08927790260472944.
10
Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of prostate in 132 consecutive patients with large gland: three-year follow-up results.132 例大体积前列腺患者行双极等离子经尿道前列腺切除术:3 年随访结果。
Urology. 2012 Feb;79(2):397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.08.052. Epub 2011 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Necrosis zone depth after bipolar plasma vaporization and resection in the human prostate.双极等离子体汽化和切除术后人体前列腺坏死区深度
Asian J Urol. 2023 Apr;10(2):144-150. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.002. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
2
Bipolar and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate are equally effective and safe in this high quality randomized controled trial.在这项高质量随机对照试验中,双极和单极经尿道前列腺切除术同样有效且安全。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):145-148. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0766.1.
3
A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications.
一项比较双极等离子经尿道前列腺切除术和单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺增生的前瞻性随机研究:疗效、性功能、生活质量和并发症。
Int Braz J Urol. 2021 Jan-Feb;47(1):131-144. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2019.0766.
4
Reprint - Bipolar vs. monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction: A Cochrane review.转载 - 双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻继发下尿路症状:Cochrane系统评价
Can Urol Assoc J. 2020 Dec;14(12):423-430. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6464.
5
Bipolar versus monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction.双极与单极经尿道前列腺切除术治疗良性前列腺梗阻继发的下尿路症状
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 3;12(12):CD009629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009629.pub4.
6
Transurethral procedures in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications.经尿道手术治疗良性前列腺增生:有效性和并发症的系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Dec;97(51):e13360. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000013360.
7
Transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic vapo-enucleation of the prostate: Is it safe for patients on chronic oral anticoagulants and/or platelet aggregation inhibitors?经尿道双极等离子体动力前列腺汽化剜除术:对于长期口服抗凝剂和/或血小板聚集抑制剂的患者是否安全?
Arab J Urol. 2017 Nov 6;15(4):347-354. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.09.005. eCollection 2017 Dec.
8
Urethral strictures after bipolar transurethral resection of prostate may be linked to slow resection rate.经尿道双极前列腺切除术治疗后发生尿道狭窄可能与切除速度较慢有关。
Investig Clin Urol. 2017 May;58(3):186-191. doi: 10.4111/icu.2017.58.3.186. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Prospective randomized study comparing monopolar with bipolar transurethral resection of prostate in benign prostatic obstruction: 36-month outcomes.前瞻性随机研究比较良性前列腺梗阻中经尿道前列腺切除术的单极与双极:36 个月的结果。
World J Urol. 2017 Oct;35(10):1595-1601. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2023-7. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Bipolar transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate versus bipolar resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 60gr: A retrospective study at a single academic tertiary care center.双极经尿道前列腺剜除术与前列腺电切术治疗大于60克前列腺的比较:单学术三级医疗中心的回顾性研究
Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):747-56. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0225.