Plug Leendert, Sharrack Basil, Reuber Markus
Department of Linguistics and Phonetics, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Epilepsia. 2009 May;50(5):994-1000. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01798.x. Epub 2008 Oct 24.
To increase understanding of the subjective symptomatology of seizure experiences and improve differential diagnosis by studying the seizure metaphors used by patients with (psychogenic) nonepileptic seizures (NES) and epilepsy.
Twenty-one unselected patients taking part in this study were admitted for 48 h of video-EEG (electroenceophalography) observation because of uncertainty about the diagnosis. Eight were proven to have epilepsy, 13 to have psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES). During their admission, patients were interviewed by a neurologist. A linguist blinded to the medical diagnosis identified and categorized all seizure metaphors in verbatim transcripts. Between-group comparisons and logistic regression analysis were carried out.
Of 382 metaphors identified, 80.8% conceptualized seizures as an agent/force, event/situation, or space/place. Most patients used metaphors from all categories, but patients with epilepsy and PNES showed preferences for different metaphoric concepts (differences p = 0.009 to p = 0.039). Patients with epilepsy preferred metaphors depicting the seizure as an agent/force or event/situation. PNES patients more often used metaphors of space/place. Logistic regression analyses predicted the diagnosis of PNES or epilepsy correctly in 85.7% of cases (based on different metaphor types in the each category) or 81.0% (based on all metaphor tokens).
Patients with epilepsy and PNES have different preferences in the metaphoric conceptualization of their seizures. Epileptic seizures are described as a more external, self-directed entity than PNES, which are depicted as a state or place patients go through. The differentiating value of metaphoric conceptualizations suggests that metaphor preference could form the basis of future diagnostic questionnaires or other diagnostic tools.
通过研究(心理性)非癫痫性发作(NES)和癫痫患者所使用的发作隐喻,增进对发作体验主观症状学的理解,并改善鉴别诊断。
由于诊断存在不确定性,21名未经挑选的患者参与本研究并接受了48小时的视频脑电图(EEG)观察。其中8人被证实患有癫痫,13人患有心理性非癫痫性发作(PNES)。在住院期间,患者接受了神经科医生的访谈。一名对医学诊断不知情的语言学家在逐字记录中识别并分类了所有发作隐喻。进行了组间比较和逻辑回归分析。
在识别出的382个隐喻中,80.8%将发作概念化为一种主体/力量、事件/情境或空间/场所。大多数患者使用了所有类别的隐喻,但癫痫患者和PNES患者对不同的隐喻概念有偏好(差异p = 0.009至p = 0.039)。癫痫患者更喜欢将发作描述为主体/力量或事件/情境的隐喻。PNES患者更常使用空间/场所的隐喻。逻辑回归分析在85.7%的病例中(基于每个类别中的不同隐喻类型)或81.0%(基于所有隐喻标记)正确预测了PNES或癫痫的诊断。
癫痫患者和PNES患者在发作的隐喻概念化方面有不同的偏好。与PNES相比,癫痫发作被描述为一个更外在、自我导向的实体,PNES被描绘为患者经历的一种状态或场所。隐喻概念化的鉴别价值表明,隐喻偏好可以成为未来诊断问卷或其他诊断工具的基础。