Schwarm A, Schweigert M, Ortmann S, Hummel J, Janssens G P J, Streich W J, Clauss M
Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2009 Oct;93(5):596-605. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0396.2008.00842.x. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
Faecal nitrogen (FN) concentration is used as a marker for habitat quality and digestive efficiency in free-ranging herbivores. In herbivores, FN can be separated into undigested plant N (analysed as the N concentration of the neutral detergent residue) and metabolic faecal N (MFN). It has been suggested that by differential analysis of the faecal fibre-bound N, the MFN fraction can be further split into a bacterial N and an endogenous N fraction [Hesta et al., Br. J. Nutr. 90 (2003) 1007]. We applied these methods to 96 faecal samples of 48 mammalian herbivore species from zoos. Species were grouped into coprophageous and non-coprophageous hindgut fermenters and ruminating and non-ruminating foregut fermenters. Diet was not controlled. The FN decreased with body mass, possibly reflecting higher proportions of concentrates in diets of smaller animals. The proportion of MFN increased with FN, indicating that higher quality food might enhance the gastrointestinal bacterial flora. The only outlier to this pattern was the lesser panda (Ailurus fulgens), confirming the low relevance of fermentative digestion in this herbivorous 'carnivore'. No relevant differences between the four digestion types were noted. The proportion of endogenous faecal N (32-80% of FN) was always higher than that of bacterial faecal N (7-30%), which contradicts basal understanding of herbivore digestive physiology. Thus, the method of Hesta et al. (2003) does not appear applicable to herbivores. While the results do not exclude the possibility that detailed differences might occur between digestion types, they indicate a high degree of similarity between herbivores that rely on bacterial fermentation, regardless of their digestion type, with respect to metabolic faecal losses.
粪便氮(FN)浓度被用作自由放养食草动物栖息地质量和消化效率的标志物。在食草动物中,FN可分为未消化的植物氮(分析为中性洗涤剂残渣的氮浓度)和代谢粪便氮(MFN)。有人提出,通过对粪便纤维结合氮的差异分析,MFN部分可进一步分为细菌氮和内源性氮部分[赫斯塔等人,《英国营养学杂志》90(2003年)1007]。我们将这些方法应用于来自动物园的48种哺乳动物食草动物的96份粪便样本。物种被分为食粪性和非食粪性后肠发酵动物以及反刍性和非反刍性前肠发酵动物。饮食未受控制。FN随体重下降,这可能反映了较小动物饮食中浓缩物比例较高。MFN的比例随FN增加,表明高质量食物可能会增强胃肠道细菌菌群。这种模式的唯一异常值是小熊猫(小熊猫属),证实了这种草食性“食肉动物”中发酵消化的相关性较低。未注意到四种消化类型之间的相关差异。内源性粪便氮的比例(占FN的32 - 80%)总是高于细菌粪便氮的比例(7 - 30%),这与食草动物消化生理学的基本认识相矛盾。因此,赫斯塔等人(2003年)的方法似乎不适用于食草动物。虽然结果不排除不同消化类型之间可能存在详细差异的可能性,但它们表明,无论消化类型如何,依赖细菌发酵的食草动物在代谢粪便损失方面具有高度相似性。