Suppr超能文献

2007年,美国牙科学院中谁在教授本科口腔修复学课程?

Who is teaching undergraduate prosthodontics in US dental schools, 2007?

作者信息

Hill Edward E, Breeding Larry C

机构信息

Department of Care Planning and Restorative Sciences, University of Mississippi School of Dentistry, Jackson, MS 39216, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2009 Feb;18(2):195-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00382.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The shortage of full-time dental school faculty along with a slow steady increase in student enrollment is not a new phenomenon. The purpose of this study was to determine who is teaching undergraduate prosthodontics in US dental schools-what percent are full-time faculty; what percent are prosthodontists; and what percent are board-certified prosthodontists-to allow schools to make a real-time comparison of the composition of instructors they have teaching prosthodontics to the apparent status quo.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A short, ten-question survey was sent via e-mail to representatives at the 55 undergraduate US dental schools. A cover letter explained the nature of the study and requested participation and electronic return of the survey. Three weeks after the initial request, an aggressive follow-up was conducted to schools that had not returned the survey. Answers were converted to percentages to compensate for differences between schools with many or few instructors. Schools were also grouped by location to see if regional differences exist.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight (69%) of the surveys were completed and returned. In general, the division between full-time and part-time instructors is about 50%. More removable prosthodontic instructors (60%) than fixed instructors (44%) are prosthodontists, and only a small percentage of the total (18% removable and 15% fixed) have completed board certification. The South and Midwest had the highest percentage of prosthodontists involved in teaching; the South had the highest percentage with specialty board certification.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that only a few schools are fortunate enough to have sufficient full-time, specialty-trained faculty available for complete coverage of all undergraduate prosthodontic courses and clinics. The information presented serves as a baseline for future comparison to see if the percentage of full-time and/or specialty-certified prosthodontic faculty changes.

摘要

目的

全职牙科学院教员短缺以及学生入学人数缓慢稳步增加并非新现象。本研究的目的是确定美国牙科学院中教授本科修复学的人员构成——全职教员的比例是多少;修复学专家的比例是多少;获得委员会认证的修复学专家的比例是多少——以便各学校能够将教授修复学的教师构成与当前的明显现状进行实时比较。

材料与方法

通过电子邮件向美国55所本科牙科学院的代表发送了一份包含10个问题的简短调查问卷。附信解释了研究的性质,并请求参与调查并以电子方式返回问卷。在首次请求三周后,对未返回问卷的学校进行了积极的跟进。答案被转换为百分比,以弥补教员数量多寡不同的学校之间的差异。学校还按地理位置分组,以查看是否存在地区差异。

结果

38份(69%)调查问卷被完成并返回。总体而言,全职和兼职教员的比例约为50%。可摘局部义齿修复学教员中修复学专家的比例(60%)高于固定义齿修复学教员(44%),并且在总数中只有一小部分(可摘局部义齿修复学为18%,固定义齿修复学为15%)完成了委员会认证。南部和中西部地区参与教学的修复学专家比例最高;南部获得专科委员会认证的比例最高。

结论

本研究表明,只有少数学校有幸拥有足够的全职、经过专业培训的教员,能够全面覆盖所有本科修复学课程和临床实习。所提供的信息作为未来比较的基线,以查看全职和/或获得专科认证的修复学教员的比例是否发生变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验