Suppr超能文献

一项针对美国口腔修复医师和牙科学院关于全口义齿修复最终印模的当前材料和方法的调查。

A survey of U.S. prosthodontists and dental schools on the current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics.

作者信息

Petrie Cynthia S, Walker Mary P, Williams Karen

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

出版信息

J Prosthodont. 2005 Dec;14(4):253-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2005.00051.x.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to survey members of The American College of Prosthodontists (ACP) to evaluate current materials and methods for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics in the United States. In addition, those methods were compared with methods and materials taught in U.S. dental schools via a second survey sent to the chairpersons of prosthodontic/restorative departments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was mailed to all 1762 active ACP members in the United States in 2003. A slightly modified questionnaire was also distributed to chairpersons of prosthodontic/restorative departments in the 54 U.S. dental schools. Data analysis was performed via frequency distribution and chi-square statistics.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and forty-five questionnaires were returned by members of the ACP (54% return rate) and 42 questionnaires were returned by the U.S. dental schools (78% return rate). The majority of the reporting prosthodontists (88%) and dental schools (98%) use a border-molded custom tray for final impressions for complete denture prosthodontics. The most popular material for border molding was plastic modeling compound (67% of reporting ACP members, and 95% of the responding dental schools). Variability of the materials used for final impressions was observed, with the most popular materials being polyvinylsiloxane for the ACP members (36%) and polysulfide for the dental schools (64%). Statistically significant differences were found in the materials used for border molding by prosthodontists based on the time elapsed since completion of prosthodontic training. No differences were found in the materials used for impression of edentulous arches based on years of experience. Geographic location did not influence the materials and methods used by prosthodontists for complete denture final impressions.

CONCLUSIONS

There was variability of the materials and techniques used for final impressions by ACP members and dental schools; however, overall there was an agreement on the materials and techniques used by prosthodontists and dental schools. Distinct trends for increasing use of polyvinylsiloxane and polyether for border molding procedures and impressions of edentulous arches were observed both in members of the ACP and in the U.S. dental schools.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对美国口腔修复医师学会(ACP)的成员进行调查,以评估美国全口义齿修复中最终印模的当前材料和方法。此外,通过向口腔修复/修复科主任发送的第二项调查,将这些方法与美国牙科学校教授的方法和材料进行比较。

材料与方法

2003年,一份匿名问卷被邮寄给美国所有1762名活跃的ACP成员。一份稍有修改的问卷也被分发给了54所美国牙科学校的口腔修复/修复科主任。通过频率分布和卡方统计进行数据分析。

结果

ACP成员返回了945份问卷(回复率54%),美国牙科学校返回了42份问卷(回复率78%)。大多数报告的口腔修复医师(88%)和牙科学校(98%)使用边缘成型的定制托盘进行全口义齿修复的最终印模。边缘成型最常用的材料是塑料成型化合物(报告的ACP成员中有67%,回复的牙科学校中有95%)。观察到最终印模所用材料的变异性,ACP成员最常用的材料是聚乙烯基硅氧烷(36%),牙科学校最常用的材料是聚硫化物(64%)。根据口腔修复培训完成后的时间,口腔修复医师在边缘成型所用材料上存在统计学显著差异。根据经验年限,在无牙颌弓印模所用材料上未发现差异。地理位置不影响口腔修复医师用于全口义齿最终印模的材料和方法。

结论

ACP成员和牙科学校在最终印模所用材料和技术上存在变异性;然而,总体而言,口腔修复医师和牙科学校在所用材料和技术上达成了一致。在ACP成员和美国牙科学校中,均观察到在边缘成型程序和无牙颌弓印模中越来越多地使用聚乙烯基硅氧烷和聚醚的明显趋势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验