Rønningen Aud, Kjeken Ingvild
Lillehammer Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Margrethe Grundtvigs v 6, 2609 Lillehammer, Norway.
Scand J Occup Ther. 2008 Sep;15(3):173-83. doi: 10.1080/11038120802031129.
The aim of this study was to test the effect of an intensive hand exercise programme in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Designed as a clinical controlled trial, the first 30 participants received a conservative exercise programme (CEP), while the next 30 received an intensive exercise programme (IEP). Outcomes were assessed at baseline, and after 2 and 14 weeks. Hand strength, measured as grip strength and pinch strength, was the primary outcome variable. Secondary outcomes were joint mobility, hand pain, and functional ability. After two weeks, there were significant differences between the groups in favour of the IEP in pinch strength in the dominant hand (p = 0.01), as well as grip and pinch strength in the non-dominant hand (p = 0.04 and 0.05, respectively). After 14 weeks, there was a significant difference between the two groups in grip strength in the non-dominant hand (p = 0.04), again in favour of the IEP. There was a trend towards increased pain in the CEP group and towards decreased pain in the IEP group, with significant differences between the groups in several measures of pain after 2 and 14 weeks. However, there were few significant differences between the two groups regarding joint mobility and functional ability. The results indicate that, compared with a traditional programme, an intensive hand exercise programme is well tolerated and more effective in improving hand function in patients with RA.
本研究的目的是测试强化手部锻炼计划对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的效果。该研究设计为临床对照试验,前30名参与者接受保守锻炼计划(CEP),随后的30名参与者接受强化锻炼计划(IEP)。在基线、2周和14周后对结果进行评估。以握力和捏力衡量的手部力量是主要结局变量。次要结局包括关节活动度、手部疼痛和功能能力。两周后,两组之间在优势手的捏力方面(p = 0.01)以及非优势手的握力和捏力方面(分别为p = 0.04和0.05)存在有利于IEP的显著差异。14周后,两组在非优势手的握力方面存在显著差异(p = 0.04),同样有利于IEP。CEP组有疼痛增加的趋势,而IEP组有疼痛减轻的趋势,在2周和14周后的多项疼痛测量指标上两组之间存在显著差异。然而,两组在关节活动度和功能能力方面几乎没有显著差异。结果表明,与传统计划相比,强化手部锻炼计划耐受性良好,在改善RA患者的手部功能方面更有效。