Suppr超能文献

高血压患者的ST段压低:运动试验与动态心电图的比较

ST segment depression in hypertensive patients: a comparison of exercise test versus Holter ECG.

作者信息

Uen Sakir, Fimmers Rolf, Weisser Burkhard, Balta Osman, Nickenig Georg, Mengden Thomas

机构信息

Division of Hypertension and Vascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine II, University Clinic, Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(5):1073-80. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s2419.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study compared ST segment depression (ST depression) during cycle ergometry (ergometry) versus simultaneous 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure measurement and electrocardiogram recording (24-h ABPM/ECG) during everyday life.

METHODS

In a German multicenter study, ergometry and 24-h ABPM/ECG records of 239 hypertensive patients were retrospectively analyzed. ST depression was defined as an ST segment depression (1 mm limb or chest recordings V1 to V6) in an incremental cycle ergometry, or 1 mm in the 24-h ABPM/ECG recording under everyday conditions. Blood pressure parameters at the onset of ST depression in the context of the respective method were compared.

RESULTS

18 patients had ST depression only in ergometry (group B), 23 had ST depression only during 24-h ABPM/ECG monitoring (group C) and 28 patients had ST depression with both methods (group D). Group A had no ST depression with any method. In group D, at the onset of ST depression with 24-h ABPM/ECG investigation, all parameters except diastolic blood pressure were significantly lower compared with the corresponding parameters at the onset of ST depression with ergometry (systolic blood pressure: 148 +/- 19 vers 188 +/- 35 mmHg, p < 0.001; heart rate: 93 +/- 12 vs 120 +/- 21 beat/min, p < 0.0001; double product: 13,714 +/- 2315 vs 22,992 +/- 3,985 mmHg/min), p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

ST depressions during everyday life detected by 24-h ABPM/ECG are characterized by a substantially lower triggering threshold for blood pressure level parameters compared with ergometry. The two methods detecting ischemia do not replace but complement each other.

摘要

引言

本研究比较了在日常活动中,蹬车测力法(测力计)时的ST段压低(ST压低)与同时进行的24小时动态血压测量及心电图记录(24小时动态血压监测/心电图)时的ST段压低情况。

方法

在一项德国多中心研究中,对239例高血压患者的测力计记录和24小时动态血压监测/心电图记录进行了回顾性分析。ST压低定义为在递增式蹬车测力法中ST段压低(肢体导联或胸导联记录V1至V6压低1毫米),或在日常条件下24小时动态血压监测/心电图记录中压低1毫米。比较了在各自方法中ST压低开始时的血压参数。

结果

18例患者仅在测力计检查时有ST压低(B组),23例患者仅在24小时动态血压监测/心电图监测时有ST压低(C组),28例患者两种方法均有ST压低(D组)。A组采用任何方法均无ST压低。在D组中,24小时动态血压监测/心电图检查出现ST压低时,除舒张压外,所有参数与测力计检查出现ST压低时的相应参数相比均显著降低(收缩压:148±19对188±35 mmHg,p<0.001;心率:93±12对120±21次/分钟,p<0.0001;双乘积:13,714±2315对22,992±3,985 mmHg/分钟,p<0.0001)。

结论

与测力计检查相比,24小时动态血压监测/心电图检测到的日常生活中的ST压低,其血压水平参数的触发阈值显著更低。这两种检测缺血的方法并非相互替代,而是相互补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a0ba/2605337/2eb52dab2979/vhrm-4-1073f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验