Goh J, Stanford E J, Genadry R
Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 May;20(5):605-10. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0804-2. Epub 2009 Jan 30.
The aim of this paper is to review proposed classifications for genito-urinary fistulae.
A comprehensive literature review of historical texts, peer review publications, and abstracts was used to compile a listing of the existing genito-urinary fistula classification systems.
The absence of an accepted standardized classification for female genito-urinary fistulae has resulted in the proliferation of a number of individually devised categorizations. Fistulae are described by size, location, degree of vaginal scarring, and type (whether it involves the bladder, rectum, intestines, uterus, etc). In addition, most classification systems have not been subjected to outcomes research, making them primarily descriptive in nature.
There is a lack of consensus among fistula surgeons in adopting a standardized classification system or systems. Comparative assessment of studies and outcomes is not possible without a standardized classification system. Currently, there is no accepted standardized classification for female genito-urinary fistula.
本文旨在综述泌尿生殖瘘的拟议分类。
通过对历史文献、同行评审出版物及摘要进行全面的文献综述,以编制现有泌尿生殖瘘分类系统清单。
女性泌尿生殖瘘缺乏公认的标准化分类,导致众多自行设计的分类方法不断涌现。瘘管通过大小、位置、阴道瘢痕程度及类型(是否累及膀胱、直肠、肠道、子宫等)来描述。此外,大多数分类系统尚未进行疗效研究,本质上主要是描述性的。
瘘管外科医生在采用标准化分类系统方面缺乏共识。没有标准化分类系统,就无法对研究和结果进行比较评估。目前,女性泌尿生殖瘘尚无公认的标准化分类。