Windfuhr Jochen P, Schlöndorff Georg, Sesterhenn Andreas M, Kremer Bernd
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, St Anna Hospital, Albertus Magnus Str. 33, 47259, Duisburg, Germany.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Oct;266(10):1621-40. doi: 10.1007/s00405-009-0910-2. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
Due to various reasons, localized neural lesions following tonsillectomy are presumably an under-reported complication in the literature. This study was undertaken to compile our experiences including a literature review to disseminate useful insights in the etiology and prognosis of this rare entity. A retrospective chart review of expert reports written by at least one of the authors for malpractice claims in relation to tonsillectomy was undertaken. Additionally, a retrospective analysis of 648 patient documents that had undergone tonsillectomy in 2001 at our institution and a comprehensive literature review were performed. The research was restricted to the item "localized neural lesion". Seven cases from the expert's offices, one of our patients who had undergone tonsillectomy at our institution and 122 cases from the literature matched our search criteria. Including our own cases, the glossopharyngeal nerve was affected in 82 patients. Other lesions encompassed injury of the hypoglossal nerve as solitary (15) or combined (5) lesion, recurrent nerve paralysis with (2) or without additional nerve lesions (7), facial nerve paralysis (10) in combination with other nerve lesions (1), and a lingual nerve deficiency as solitary (4) or combined lesion (9). A single report existed for lesion of the phrenic nerve. There were five reported cases with blindness and nine cases with Horner's syndrome. Albeit rare, localized neural lesions may occur as a troublesome complication following tonsillectomy and/or means to achieve hemostasis. Some of these cases may not result from the dissection itself but injection procedures. Surgical dissection should include careful mouth gag insertion and meticulous dissection to minimize the risk of localized neural complications. A long-term follow-up is recommended for patients with dysgeusia related to glossopharyngeal nerve injury and patients with recurrent nerve dysfunction. Other lesions are much less likely to resolve in the long-term. Localized neural lesions should adequately be included in the informed consent for tonsillectomy as well as for surgical treatment of post-tonsillectomy hemorrhage.
由于各种原因,扁桃体切除术后局部神经损伤在文献中可能是一种报道不足的并发症。本研究旨在汇总我们的经验并进行文献综述,以传播有关这一罕见病症的病因和预后的有用见解。我们对至少一位作者撰写的关于扁桃体切除术后医疗事故索赔的专家报告进行了回顾性病历审查。此外,我们对2001年在我们机构接受扁桃体切除术的648份患者病历进行了回顾性分析,并进行了全面的文献综述。研究仅限于“局部神经损伤”这一项目。来自专家办公室的7例病例、1例在我们机构接受扁桃体切除术的患者以及文献中的122例病例符合我们的搜索标准。包括我们自己的病例在内,82例患者的舌咽神经受到影响。其他损伤包括单独(15例)或合并(5例)损伤的舌下神经损伤、伴有(2例)或不伴有其他神经损伤(7例)的喉返神经麻痹、伴有其他神经损伤(1例)的面神经麻痹(10例)以及单独(4例)或合并损伤(9例)的舌神经缺损。有一份关于膈神经损伤的报告。有5例报告的失明病例和9例霍纳综合征病例。尽管罕见,但局部神经损伤可能是扁桃体切除术后和/或实现止血手段的一种麻烦并发症。其中一些病例可能不是由手术解剖本身引起的,而是由注射操作引起的。手术解剖应包括小心插入口腔撑开器和细致解剖,以尽量减少局部神经并发症的风险。对于与舌咽神经损伤相关的味觉障碍患者和喉返神经功能障碍患者,建议进行长期随访。其他损伤在长期内恢复的可能性要小得多。扁桃体切除术以及扁桃体切除术后出血的手术治疗的知情同意书中应充分纳入局部神经损伤的内容。