Jakubíková Janka, Kabátová Zuzana, Pavlovcinová Gabriela, Profant Milan
Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology Department of Medical Faculty of Commenius University and Children's University Hospital, Limbova 1, 833 40 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009 Apr;73(4):607-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Jan 31.
More than 80% of permanent hearing losses (HL) in children are congenital. Newborn hearing screening (NHS) is the best method for early detection of suspected hearing loss. If the NHS is not universal more than 30% permanent hearing losses are not identified. There are various methods of NHS: otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE, DPOAE) and automatic auditory brainstem response (AABR). After hearing screening, and when hearing loss is suspected, tympanometry and audiological methods then used for determination of hearing threshold; these include ABR, ASSR or/and behavioral methods. The goal of this study is to evaluate the influence of UNHS on the early detection of hearing loss in children before and after the implementation of obligatory universal newborn hearing screening in Slovakia, and also on the etiologic evaluation of hearing impaired infants identified by screening.
In Slovakia NHS started in 1998 and was provided in ENT departments. From May 1, 2006 UNHS has been mandatory in Slovakia, using two stages TEOAE in all newborn departments in Slovakia (64 newborn departments). In year 2005--42% of newborns in Slovakia were screened, in 2006--66% newborns and in 2007--94, 99% (three small newborn departments do not yet have equipment for OAE screening). For determination of hearing thresholds ASSR are used in two ENT departments and ABR in the other four ENT departments.
Comparing the number of identified cases with bilateral severe permanent HL or deafness before and after UNHS, 22.8% more cases of PHL were identified in the first year of UNHS. Also the average age of diagnosis of PHL was lower. In the year 2007, 94% of newborns were screened. We found 0.947/1000 newborns with bilateral severe PHL (35.9%) more than before UNHS). After audiologic and etiologic assessment of the 76 infants who failed screening, 5 (6.58%) were found to have normal hearing, 16 (22.54%) had unilateral and 55 (77.46%) had bilateral SNHL. A non-syndromic genetic cause was present in 25.45% of cases, syndromic in 9%, perinatal cause (31%), congenital CMV infection in 7.27%, bilateral cochlear anomalies without other abnormality in 1.83% and unknown etiology in 25.45%.
儿童永久性听力损失(HL)中超过80%为先天性。新生儿听力筛查(NHS)是早期发现疑似听力损失的最佳方法。如果未全面开展NHS,超过30%的永久性听力损失将无法被识别。NHS有多种方法:耳声发射(TEOAE、DPOAE)和自动听性脑干反应(AABR)。听力筛查后,若怀疑有听力损失,则使用鼓室图和听力学方法来确定听力阈值;这些方法包括ABR、ASSR或/和行为学方法。本研究的目的是评估在斯洛伐克实施强制性普遍新生儿听力筛查前后,普遍新生儿听力筛查(UNHS)对儿童听力损失早期发现的影响,以及对通过筛查确定的听力受损婴儿的病因学评估。
在斯洛伐克,NHS于1998年开始,在耳鼻喉科进行。自2006年5月1日起,斯洛伐克实施强制性UNHS,在斯洛伐克所有新生儿科室(64个新生儿科室)采用两阶段TEOAE。2005年,斯洛伐克42%的新生儿接受了筛查,2006年为66%,2007年为94%、99%(三个小型新生儿科室尚未配备耳声发射筛查设备)。为确定听力阈值,两个耳鼻喉科使用ASSR,另外四个耳鼻喉科使用ABR。
比较UNHS前后双侧重度永久性HL或耳聋确诊病例数,在UNHS实施的第一年,确诊的永久性听力损失病例多了22.8%。永久性听力损失的平均诊断年龄也更低。2007年,94%的新生儿接受了筛查。我们发现每1000名新生儿中有0.947例患有双侧重度永久性听力损失(比UNHS实施前多35.9%)。在对76名筛查未通过的婴儿进行听力学和病因学评估后,发现5例(6.58%)听力正常,16例(22.54%)为单侧听力损失,55例(77.46%)为双侧感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)。25.45%的病例存在非综合征性遗传病因,9%为综合征性病因,围产期病因占31%,先天性巨细胞病毒感染占7.27%,双侧耳蜗异常但无其他异常占1.83%,病因不明占25.45%。