Wenjin Wu, Xiangrong Tang, Yun Li, Jingrong Lü, Jianyong Chen, Xueling Wang, Zhiwu Huang, Hao Wu
1 Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
2 Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
J Int Med Res. 2018 Feb;46(2):637-651. doi: 10.1177/0300060517706643. Epub 2017 Jun 12.
Objectives Universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) started late in some underdeveloped areas in China, with relatively scarce screening resources and a wide regional distribution. This study aimed to compare the screening performance between rural and urban populations, and to examine the characteristics and problems of UNHS in underdeveloped regions in China. Methods A two-step hearing screening program was used in neonates born in Liuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital and in patients who were born in other hospitals, but admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. This program involved distortion product otoacoustic emission and automated auditory brainstem response. Characteristics of each newborn, as well as the screening outcomes and performance were compared between rural and urban populations. Results A total of 19,098 newborns were screened with a referral rate of 17.9% at the first step. Sixty-three (0.33%) newborns had hearing loss. The prevalence of permanent hearing loss was 2.25‰. The average screening age was significantly older in the rural population than in the urban population in the first ( P < 0.01) and second steps of screening ( P < 0.05). The rural population had a higher referral rate in both steps than the urban population ( P < 0.01). The follow-up rate was much lower in the rural population than in the urban population ( P < 0.05), but dramatically increased in 2014 compared with the previous 2 years. Conclusions A low follow-up rate is a critical issue when carrying out UNHS in developing countries, such as China, especially for rural populations. The government should establish more hearing referral centres to increase service coverage and supply financial assistance for low-income populations.
目的 中国一些欠发达地区的新生儿听力普遍筛查(UNHS)起步较晚,筛查资源相对匮乏且地域分布广泛。本研究旨在比较农村和城市人群的筛查效果,并探讨中国欠发达地区新生儿听力普遍筛查的特点和问题。方法 对柳州市妇幼保健院出生的新生儿以及在其他医院出生但入住新生儿重症监护病房的患儿采用两步听力筛查方案。该方案包括畸变产物耳声发射和自动听性脑干反应。比较农村和城市人群中每个新生儿的特征、筛查结果及效果。结果 共对19098名新生儿进行了筛查,第一步的转诊率为17.9%。63名(0.33%)新生儿存在听力损失。永久性听力损失的患病率为2.25‰。在第一步(P<0.01)和第二步筛查(P<0.05)中,农村人群的平均筛查年龄显著高于城市人群。农村人群在两步筛查中的转诊率均高于城市人群(P<0.01)。农村人群的随访率远低于城市人群(P<0.05),但与前两年相比,2014年有显著提高。结论 在像中国这样的发展中国家开展新生儿听力普遍筛查时,低随访率是一个关键问题,尤其是对于农村人群。政府应建立更多的听力转诊中心,以扩大服务覆盖范围,并为低收入人群提供经济援助。