Suppr超能文献

一项关于卡铂/紫杉醇/西妥昔单抗两种剂量方案用于 IIIB/IV 期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的随机 II 期试验。

A randomized, phase II trial of two dose schedules of carboplatin/paclitaxel/cetuximab in stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

作者信息

Socinski M A, Saleh M N, Trent D F, Dobbs T W, Zehngebot L M, Levine M A, Bordoni R, Stella P J

机构信息

Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2009 Jun;20(6):1068-73. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn745. Epub 2009 Feb 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of weekly cetuximab combined with two different schedules of paclitaxel/carboplatin for stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

A total of 168 patients with previously untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized to arm A, cetuximab (400 mg/m(2) day 1 followed by weekly 250 mg/m(2)) + paclitaxel (Taxol) (225 mg/m(2))/carboplatin (AUC6) day 1 every 3 weeks or arm B, same cetuximab regimen plus paclitaxel (100 mg/m(2)) days 1, 8, and 15 every 3 weeks and carboplatin (AUC6) day 1 every 4 weeks. Treatment continued for a four-cycle maximum. Patients with a complete response, partial response, or stable disease after four cycles could receive cetuximab 250 mg/m(2)/week until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Median PFS was 4.7 and 4.3 months for arms A and B, respectively (6-month PFS, 27.3% versus 30.9%). Median overall survival was 11.4 versus 9.8 months for arms A and B, respectively; estimated 1-year survival, 47.7% versus 39.3%; and objective response rate, 29.6% versus 25%. The regimen was well tolerated with rash and hematologic toxicity being most common.

CONCLUSIONS

This study did not meet the prespecified benchmark of 35% 6-month PFS rate; both combination schedules of cetuximab plus paclitaxel/carboplatin were feasible and equivalent for treating advanced NSCLC.

摘要

背景

本试验研究了西妥昔单抗每周一次联合两种不同方案的紫杉醇/卡铂用于ⅢB/Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。

方法

总共168例先前未接受过治疗的ⅢB/Ⅳ期NSCLC患者被随机分为A组,西妥昔单抗(第1天400mg/m²,随后每周250mg/m²)+紫杉醇(泰素)(225mg/m²)/卡铂(AUC6)每3周第1天给药,或B组,相同的西妥昔单抗方案加紫杉醇(100mg/m²)第1、8和15天给药,每3周一次,卡铂(AUC6)每4周第1天给药。治疗最多持续四个周期。四个周期后达到完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定的患者可接受西妥昔单抗250mg/m²/周,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性。主要终点是评估无进展生存期(PFS)。

结果

A组和B组的中位PFS分别为4.7个月和4.3个月(6个月PFS,分别为27.3%和30.9%)。A组和B组中位总生存期分别为11.4个月和9.8个月;估计1年生存率分别为47.7%和39.3%;客观缓解率分别为29.6%和25%。该方案耐受性良好,皮疹和血液学毒性最为常见。

结论

本研究未达到预设的6个月PFS率35%的基准;西妥昔单抗联合紫杉醇/卡铂的两种联合方案在治疗晚期NSCLC方面都是可行且等效的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验