奥培米芬治疗神经性糖尿病足溃疡。 (注:你提供的原文标题与后面翻译内容中的“奥培米芬”不对应,按照原文“Apligraf”应是“奥皮格拉夫”,一种用于治疗糖尿病足溃疡的产品,这里推测你可能想表达的是“奥培米芬在治疗神经性糖尿病足溃疡中的应用”这类意思,所以翻译内容根据推测做了适当调整,如果不是你想要的,请提供更准确信息以便我更准确翻译。) 正确译文:奥皮格拉夫治疗神经性糖尿病足溃疡。 (如果原文“Apligraf”就是你想表达的准确术语,那么这个译文才是完全符合的。) 准确译文:奥皮格拉夫用于治疗神经性糖尿病足溃疡。 (如果强调其用途表述的翻译,这样更合适)

Apligraf in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers.

作者信息

Edmonds Michael

机构信息

Diabetic Foot Clinic, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2009 Mar;8(1):11-8. doi: 10.1177/1534734609331597. Epub 2009 Feb 3.

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy and safety of Apligraf (Organogenesis, Inc., Canton, MA) in combination with standard therapy versus standard therapy alone in the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers. Efficacy was assessed by time to complete wound healing (by 12 weeks) and incidence of complete wound closure (at 12 weeks). This was an international multi-center, randomized, controlled study. Patients were eligible for entry into the study if the following criteria were met: type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus, age 18 to 80 years, adequate glycemic control, and the presence of a full-thickness neuropathic ulcer for at least 2 weeks prior to the initial screening visit. Following the 2-week screening period, the 2 treatment groups received standard ulcer care consistent with international treatment guidelines that comprised sharp debridement, saline-moistened dressings, and a non-weight bearing regimen. There were 106 subjects screened for enrollment, 82 randomized to the treatment groups, and 72 treated (33 Apligraf subjects and 39 standard therapy subjects) before the study was terminated. Kaplan-Meier curves indicated a trend for shorter time to complete wound healing in the Apligraf group compared with the standard therapy group (p = .059; log-rank test). The median time to healing was 84 days in the Apligraf group, whereas no median time to healing could be determined for the standard therapy group because <50% of the standard therapy subjects healed. By 12 weeks, 51.5% (17/33) Apligraf subjects had achieved complete wound closure compared with 26.3% (10/38) of standard therapy subjects (p = .049; Fisher's exact test). Even though the study was halted prematurely, this study suggested that the use of Apligraf resulted in a higher incidence of wound closure by 12 weeks.

摘要

本研究比较了Apligraf(Organogenesis公司,马萨诸塞州坎顿)联合标准治疗与单纯标准治疗在治疗糖尿病性神经病变足溃疡方面的疗效和安全性。通过伤口完全愈合时间(至12周)和完全伤口闭合发生率(在12周时)评估疗效。这是一项国际多中心、随机、对照研究。如果符合以下标准,患者有资格进入研究:1型或2型糖尿病,年龄18至80岁,血糖控制良好,并且在初次筛查就诊前至少2周存在全层神经病变溃疡。在2周的筛查期后,两个治疗组接受符合国际治疗指南的标准溃疡护理,包括锐性清创、盐水湿润敷料和非负重方案。共有106名受试者被筛选纳入研究,82名被随机分配到治疗组,在研究终止前有72名接受了治疗(33名使用Apligraf的受试者和39名接受标准治疗的受试者)。Kaplan-Meier曲线表明,与标准治疗组相比,Apligraf组伤口完全愈合时间有缩短趋势(p = 0.059;对数秩检验)。Apligraf组的愈合中位时间为84天,而标准治疗组无法确定愈合中位时间,因为接受标准治疗的受试者中不到50%愈合。到12周时,51.5%(17/33)使用Apligraf的受试者实现了完全伤口闭合,而标准治疗受试者为26.3%(10/38)(p = 0.049;Fisher精确检验)。尽管该研究提前终止,但该研究表明,使用Apligraf可使12周时伤口闭合的发生率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索