Ennis William J, Foremann Phil, Mozen Neal, Massey Joi, Conner-Kerr Teresa, Meneses Patricio
Wound Treatment Program, Advocate Christ Medical Center, 4440 West 95th Street, Oak Lawn, IL 60453, USA.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 Aug;51(8):24-39.
An estimated 15% of patients with diabetes will develop a foot ulcer sometime in their life, making them 30 to 40 times more likely to undergo amputation due to a non-healing foot ulcer than the non-diabetic population. To determine the safety and efficacy of a new, non-contact, kilohertz ultrasound therapy for the healing of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers - as well as to evaluate the impact on total closure and quantitative bacterial cultures and the effect on healing of various levels of sharp/surgical debridement - a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, multicenter study was conducted in hospital-based and private wound care clinics. Patients (55 met criteria for efficacy analysis) received standard of care, which included products that provide a moist environment, offloading diabetic shoes and socks, debridement, wound evaluation, and measurement. The "therapy" was either active 40 KHz ultrasound delivered by a saline mist or a "sham device" which delivered a saline mist without the use of ultrasound. After 12 weeks of care, the proportion of wounds healed (defined as complete epithelialization without drainage) in the active ultrasound therapy device group was significantly higher than that in the sham control group (40.7% versus 14.3%, P = 0.0366, Fisher's exact test). The ultrasound treatment was easy to use and no difference in the number and type of adverse events between the two treatment groups was noted. Of interest, wounds were debrided at baseline followed by a quantitative culture biopsy. The results of these cultures demonstrated a significant bioburden (greater than 10(5)) in the majority of cases, despite a lack of clinical signs of infection. Compared to control, this therapeutic modality was found to increase the healing rate of recalcitrant, diabetic foot ulcers.
据估计,15%的糖尿病患者在其一生中的某个时候会发生足部溃疡,这使得他们因足部溃疡不愈合而接受截肢的可能性比非糖尿病患者高30至40倍。为了确定一种新型非接触式千赫兹超声疗法治疗顽固性糖尿病足部溃疡的安全性和有效性,以及评估其对完全愈合、定量细菌培养的影响,以及不同程度的锐性/手术清创对愈合的效果,在医院和私立伤口护理诊所进行了一项随机、双盲、假对照、多中心研究。患者(55例符合疗效分析标准)接受标准治疗,包括提供湿润环境的产品、减压糖尿病鞋和袜子、清创、伤口评估和测量。“治疗”要么是通过盐水雾输送的40千赫兹活性超声,要么是不使用超声而输送盐水雾的“假装置”。经过12周的护理,活性超声治疗装置组伤口愈合(定义为完全上皮化且无引流)的比例显著高于假对照组(40.7%对14.3%,P = 0.0366,Fisher精确检验)。超声治疗易于使用,且两个治疗组之间不良事件的数量和类型没有差异。有趣的是,在基线时对伤口进行清创,然后进行定量培养活检。这些培养结果显示,尽管缺乏感染的临床体征,但大多数病例中存在显著的生物负荷(大于10⁵)。与对照组相比,发现这种治疗方式可提高顽固性糖尿病足部溃疡的愈合率。