• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

出血性手术中床旁凝血检测与中心实验室凝血检测的比较:一项多中心研究

Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study.

作者信息

Toulon Pierre, Ozier Yves, Ankri Annick, Fléron Marie-Hélène, Leroux Geneviève, Samama Charles Marc

机构信息

CHU, Hôpital de Cimiez, Service d'Hématologie Biologique, 4 avenue de la Reine Victoria, BP 1179, F-06003 Nice Cedex 1, France.

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2009 Feb;101(2):394-401.

PMID:19190827
Abstract

Delay in collecting coagulation test results from a central laboratory is one of the critical issues to efficiently control haemostasis during surgery. The aim of this multicenter study was to compare the performance of a point-of-care (POC) device (CoaguChek Pro DM) with the central laboratory-based coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. For this purpose, 93 patients undergoing major surgical procedure were prospectively included in three centers. Blood was drawn from all patients before surgical incision and from most patients during surgical procedure after a blood loss of 25% or more was observed. When expressed in activity percentage, POC-based prothrombin time (PT) was in good agreement with central laboratory test result with coefficient of correlation in the range from 0.711 to 0.960 in the three centers. Comparison was less conclusive when PT was expressed in seconds or as the patient-to-control ratio and for activated partial thromboplastin time, with significantly shorter clotting times and lower ratios obtained on the POC device. On-site PT (in activity percentage) monitoring would have induced no significant change in fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion in patients when compared to central laboratory monitoring. Test results were obtained in less than 5 minutes when performed using the POC device versus a median turnaround time of 88 minutes (range: 29-235 minutes) when blood collection tubes were sent to the central laboratory. These results suggest that, in providing a rapid answer, POC-based monitoring of PT (in percentage) using the CoaguChek device could be validly used in patients undergoing haemorrhagic surgical procedures.

摘要

从中心实验室获取凝血检测结果的延迟是手术期间有效控制止血的关键问题之一。这项多中心研究的目的是比较即时检验(POC)设备(CoaguChek Pro DM)与中心实验室凝血检测在出血性手术中的性能。为此,三个中心前瞻性纳入了93例接受大手术的患者。在手术切口前从所有患者采集血液,在观察到失血25%或更多后,从大多数手术过程中的患者采集血液。以活性百分比表示时,基于POC的凝血酶原时间(PT)与中心实验室检测结果高度一致,三个中心的相关系数范围为0.711至0.960。当PT以秒或患者与对照比值表示时,以及对于活化部分凝血活酶时间,比较结果不太确定,POC设备上获得的凝血时间明显更短,比值更低。与中心实验室监测相比,现场PT(以活性百分比表示)监测不会导致患者新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)输注有显著变化。使用POC设备进行检测时,不到5分钟即可获得检测结果,而将采血管送至中心实验室时,中位周转时间为88分钟(范围:29 - 235分钟)。这些结果表明,通过CoaguChek设备基于POC的PT(百分比)监测能够快速得出结果,可有效地用于接受出血性手术的患者。

相似文献

1
Point-of-care versus central laboratory coagulation testing during haemorrhagic surgery. A multicenter study.出血性手术中床旁凝血检测与中心实验室凝血检测的比较:一项多中心研究
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Feb;101(2):394-401.
2
Is perioperative point-of-care prothrombin time testing accurate compared to the standard laboratory test?围手术期即时凝血酶原时间检测与标准实验室检测相比准确吗?
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Oct;102(4):779-86. doi: 10.1160/TH09-03-0157.
3
Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.即时检测与中心实验室检测:学术医疗中心的经济分析
Clin Ther. 1994 Sep-Oct;16(5):898-910; discussion 854.
4
Evaluation of a point-of-care coagulation analyzer on patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.对接受体外循环手术患者使用即时凝血分析仪的评估。
J Clin Anesth. 2004 Feb;16(1):7-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2003.03.004.
5
Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.CoaguChek XS系统性能验证结果。
Thromb Res. 2008;123(2):381-9. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2008.04.021. Epub 2008 Jun 27.
6
Point of care and central laboratory determinations of the aPTT are not interchangeable in surgical intensive care patients.在外科重症监护患者中,床旁检测和中心实验室检测活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)的结果不可相互替代。
Can J Anaesth. 2001 Dec;48(11):1155-60. doi: 10.1007/BF03020384.
7
Noncitrated whole blood is optimal for evaluation of postinjury coagulopathy with point-of-care rapid thrombelastography.对于使用即时护理快速血栓弹力图评估创伤后凝血病而言,未枸橼酸化的全血是最佳选择。
J Surg Res. 2009 Sep;156(1):133-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.03.046. Epub 2009 May 3.
8
Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.用于监测华法林口服抗凝治疗的即时检测设备(CoaguChek XS)与奥伦氏凝血酶原时间测定法的比较与评估。
Thromb Res. 2009 Jul;124(3):344-8. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.03.007. Epub 2009 May 6.
9
The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.即时凝血酶原时间检测的可靠性。CoaguChek S 和 XS INR 测量值与医院实验室监测的比较。
Int J Lab Hematol. 2010 Feb;32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-553X.2008.01120.x. Epub 2008 Nov 18.
10
Point-of-care testing of neonatal coagulation.新生儿凝血的即时检验
Clin Lab Haematol. 2006 Apr;28(2):117-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2257.2006.00765.x.

引用本文的文献

1
evaluation and efficacy of bacteriophage isolated from commercial poultry farms against .从商业家禽养殖场分离出的噬菌体对……的评估及功效
Vet Res Forum. 2025;16(5):267-275. doi: 10.30466/vrf.2024.2030436.4305. Epub 2025 May 15.
2
Perioperative Changes in Hemostatic Properties as Assessed by Multiplate, Siemens PFA-200, and ROTEM-A Comparative Study.通过Multiplate、西门子PFA-200和ROTEM评估围手术期止血特性的变化:一项比较研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 28;14(5):1640. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051640.
3
Thromboelastography as an early prediction method for hypofibrinogenemia in emergency department patients with primary postpartum hemorrhage.
血栓弹力描记术作为急诊首发产后出血患者低纤维蛋白原血症的早期预测方法。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Sep 13;32(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01263-5.
4
Control of Haemorrhage in Orthopaedic Trauma.骨科创伤中的出血控制
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 22;13(14):4260. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144260.
5
The Role of Viscoelastic Testing in Assessing Hemostasis: A Challenge to Standard Laboratory Assays?黏弹性检测在评估止血中的作用:对标准实验室检测的挑战?
J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 20;13(12):3612. doi: 10.3390/jcm13123612.
6
Coagulation Tests and Bleeding Classification After Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Prospective Study.体外循环后凝血试验和出血分类:一项前瞻性研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 Jun;37(6):933-941. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.01.038. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Association of Extravascular Leakage on Computed Tomography Angiography with Fibrinogen Levels at Admission in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者入院时计算机断层血管造影血管外渗漏与纤维蛋白原水平的相关性
Neurotrauma Rep. 2022 Dec 26;4(1):3-13. doi: 10.1089/neur.2022.0054. eCollection 2022.
8
Thrombomodulin (TM), thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT), plasmin-α2-plasmininhibitor complex (PIC), and tissue plasminogen activator-inhibitor complex (t-PAIC) assessment of fibrinolytic activity in postpartum hemorrhage: a retrospective comparative cohort study.血栓调节蛋白(TM)、凝血酶 - 抗凝血酶复合物(TAT)、纤溶酶 - α2 - 纤溶酶抑制剂复合物(PIC)以及组织型纤溶酶原激活物 - 抑制剂复合物(t - PAIC)在产后出血中纤溶活性的评估:一项回顾性比较队列研究。
Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(23):1273. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5221.
9
An Agreement Study Between Point-of-Care and Laboratory Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time for Anticoagulation Monitoring During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.体外膜肺氧合期间用于抗凝监测的即时检测与实验室活化部分凝血活酶时间的一致性研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jun 29;9:931863. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.931863. eCollection 2022.
10
Use of Thromboelastography and Rotational Thromboelastometry in Otolaryngology: A Narrative Review.血栓弹力图和旋转血栓弹力测定法在耳鼻喉科的应用:一篇叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Feb 20;11(4):1119. doi: 10.3390/jcm11041119.