Rivera Michael, Tuttle R Michael, Patel Snehal, Shaha Ashok, Shah Jatin P, Ghossein Ronald A
Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center , New York, New York, USA.
Thyroid. 2009 Feb;19(2):119-27. doi: 10.1089/thy.2008.0303.
Encapsulated papillary thyroid carcinoma (EPTC) can have a histologic growth pattern similar to the one seen in classical papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) or akin to the follicular variant of PTC (FVPTC). This study aims to assess the behavior of EPTC according to its growth pattern.
All cases of thyroid carcinomas treated at our institution between 1980 and 2000 were reviewed and reclassified according to current histopathologic criteria.
After review by two pathologists, 106 cases were included. Forty-three (41%) of the cases were identified as encapsulated classical PTC (E-CPTC) and 63 (59%) as encapsulated FVPTC (E-FVPTC). E-FVPTC had a higher rate of vascular invasion (16/63; 25%) than E-CPTC (2/43; 5%) (p = 0.007). In contrast, E-CPTC had a higher frequency of capsular invasion (28/43; 65%) than E-FVPTC (24/63, 38%) (p = 0.01). The lymph node metastatic rate was significantly higher in E-CPTC (11/43, 26%) compared to E-FVPTC (2/63, 3%) (p = 0.0014). All 34 noninvasive E-FVPTC lacked evidence of nodal metastases while 4 of 15 (27%) noninvasive E-CPTC presented with nodal disease (p = 0.006). Distant metastasis occurred only in four cases of E-FVPTC at presentation. These four FVPTC had extensive capsular and/or vascular invasion and no nodal disease. None of noninvasive EPTC recurred, including 30 patients treated by lobectomy without radioactive iodine (RAI) therapy (median follow-up: 8.9 years).
E-CPTC resembles classical PTC in its propensity to metastasize to lymph nodes and its vascular/capsular invasive pattern while E-FVPTC behaves more like follicular carcinoma/adenoma group of tumors. Meticulous search for capsular and vascular invasion can reliably predict the metastatic potential of E-FVPTC but not of E-CPTC. The latter can therefore be treated like unencapsulated classical PTC. Noninvasive E-FVPTC could be managed like minimally invasive follicular carcinoma by lobectomy without RAI therapy. Invasive E-FVPTC seem quite indolent if no distant metastases are found at presentation.
包膜型甲状腺乳头状癌(EPTC)的组织学生长模式可能与经典甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)相似,或类似于PTC的滤泡状变异型(FVPTC)。本研究旨在根据其生长模式评估EPTC的生物学行为。
回顾性分析1980年至2000年在本院接受治疗的所有甲状腺癌病例,并根据当前组织病理学标准重新分类。
经两位病理学家复查,纳入106例病例。其中43例(41%)被诊断为包膜型经典PTC(E-CPTC),63例(59%)为包膜型FVPTC(E-FVPTC)。E-FVPTC的血管侵犯率(16/63;25%)高于E-CPTC(2/43;5%)(p = 0.007)。相反,E-CPTC的包膜侵犯频率(28/43;65%)高于E-FVPTC(24/63,38%)(p = 0.01)。E-CPTC的淋巴结转移率(11/43,26%)显著高于E-FVPTC(2/63,3%)(p = 0.0014)。所有34例非侵袭性E-FVPTC均无淋巴结转移证据,而15例(27%)非侵袭性E-CPTC中有4例出现淋巴结病变(p = 0.006)。远处转移仅在4例初诊的E-FVPTC中出现。这4例FVPTC有广泛的包膜和/或血管侵犯,且无淋巴结病变。所有非侵袭性EPTC均未复发,包括30例接受叶切除术且未进行放射性碘(RAI)治疗的患者(中位随访时间:8.9年)。
E-CPTC在转移至淋巴结的倾向及其血管/包膜侵犯模式方面类似于经典PTC,而E-FVPTC的生物学行为更类似于滤泡癌/腺瘤组肿瘤。仔细检查包膜和血管侵犯可可靠地预测E-FVPTC的转移潜能,但不能预测E-CPTC的转移潜能。因此,后者可按未包膜的经典PTC进行治疗。非侵袭性E-FVPTC可通过叶切除术且不进行RAI治疗,如同微创滤泡癌一样进行处理。如果初诊时未发现远处转移,侵袭性E-FVPTC似乎进展缓慢。