Finnerty Brendan M, Kleiman David A, Scognamiglio Theresa, Aronova Anna, Beninato Toni, Fahey Thomas J, Zarnegar Rasa
Department of Surgery, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA,
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1200-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4126-3. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
There are three subtypes of follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma (fvPTC): completely encapsulated, well circumscribed, and infiltrative. While infiltrative tumors are more aggressive than completely encapsulated, controversy exists regarding management of fvPTC subtypes. We compared the clinicopathologic features of fvPTC subtypes to those of classic PTC (cPTC) to help guide fvPTC management, using cPTC as a reference.
A retrospective review was performed on 316 patients with PTC treated at a single institution from 2004 to 2011. There were 197 cPTC and 119 fvPTC tumors, including completely encapsulated (n = 46), well circumscribed (n = 46), and infiltrative (n = 27). Clinicopathologic data were compared between groups.
fvPTC patients had larger tumors than cPTC patients (1.6 cm vs. 1.2 cm, p = 0.001), but age, sex, and family history did not differ. Thirty-one percent of cPTC tumors had extrathyroidal extension compared to 0 % of completely encapsulated, 0 % of well-circumscribed, and 52 % of infiltrative fvPTC tumors (p < 0.05). Central lymph node metastasis occurred in 50 % of cPTC compared to 0 % in completely encapsulated, 20 % in well-circumscribed, and 72 % in infiltrative fvPTC tumors (p < 0.05). Notably, lymph node metastasis was significantly lower in completely encapsulated than in well-circumscribed tumors, without a difference in the median number of nodes sampled. There were no differences in lymphovascular invasion or extranodal extension.
Like cPTC tumors, infiltrative fvPTC tumors have aggressive clinicopathologic features and thus should be treated similarly. Conversely, completely encapsulated and well-circumscribed tumors have less aggressive features compared to cPTC and are more self-limiting; however, well-circumscribed tumors still have a notable incidence of lymph node metastasis. Clinicians should consider this variability in their management algorithm for fvPTC.
滤泡型乳头状甲状腺癌(fvPTC)有三种亚型:完全包膜型、边界清晰型和浸润型。虽然浸润型肿瘤比完全包膜型更具侵袭性,但关于fvPTC各亚型的治疗仍存在争议。我们以经典型PTC(cPTC)为参照,比较了fvPTC各亚型与cPTC的临床病理特征,以帮助指导fvPTC的治疗。
对2004年至2011年在单一机构接受治疗的316例PTC患者进行回顾性研究。其中有197例cPTC肿瘤和119例fvPTC肿瘤,包括完全包膜型(n = 46)、边界清晰型(n = 46)和浸润型(n = 27)。对各组的临床病理数据进行比较。
fvPTC患者的肿瘤比cPTC患者的大(1.6 cm对1.2 cm,p = 0.001),但年龄、性别和家族史无差异。31%的cPTC肿瘤有甲状腺外侵犯,而完全包膜型为0%,边界清晰型为0%,浸润型fvPTC肿瘤为52%(p < 0.05)。cPTC患者中央淋巴结转移率为50%,完全包膜型为0%,边界清晰型为20%,浸润型fvPTC肿瘤为72%(p < 0.05)。值得注意的是,完全包膜型肿瘤的淋巴结转移明显低于边界清晰型肿瘤,所取淋巴结中位数无差异。在脉管侵犯或结外侵犯方面无差异。
与cPTC肿瘤一样,浸润型fvPTC肿瘤具有侵袭性的临床病理特征,因此应给予相似的治疗。相反,与cPTC相比,完全包膜型和边界清晰型肿瘤的侵袭性特征较少,且更具自限性;然而,边界清晰型肿瘤仍有显著的淋巴结转移发生率。临床医生在制定fvPTC的治疗方案时应考虑到这种变异性。