Somkotra Tewarit, Detsomboonrat Palinee
Division of Health Care Economics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Feb;37(1):85-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2008.00449.x.
To assess the socioeconomic-related (in)equality and horizontal (in)equity in oral healthcare utilization among Thai adults after Universal Coverage (UC) policy implemented nationwide, and to decompose the source of inequality in utilization. Further, to identify the determinants that effect to out-of-pocket payments for oral healthcare.
Using the data of 32748, Thai adults aged 15 years and over from nationally representative Health and Welfare Survey and Socio-Economic Survey in 2006. This study employs concentration index (CI) and horizontal inequity index (HI) to measure the socioeconomic-related inequality and horizontal inequity in oral healthcare utilization, respectively. Further, employing decomposition method to identify the sources of inequality comprising of a contribution of income, need determinants (i.e. self-assessed oral health, demographic characteristics), non-need determinants (i.e.working status, educational level attainment, type of insurance entitlement, geographic characteristics and marital status) and residual term. Two-part model is used to determine the factors effect to out-of-pocket payments for oral healthcare.
There are the pro-rich inequality and inequity in oral healthcare utilization among Thais as indicated by significantly positive values of CI (=0.199) and HI (=0.206). The poor are more likely to access and utilize services at subsidized public facility particularly community hospital, as opposed to the better-off who tend to utilize services at private facility. Income and non-need determinants principally contribute to the pro-poor in public sector utilization, unlike pro-rich in private sector utilization. Need factors account for most of the pro-poor utilization. Type of treatment obtained and insurance used in the last visit are the substantial determinants effect to incurring out-of-pocket payments for oral healthcare.
Notwithstanding the UC policy implementation made impressive strides toward improving of welfare coverage and an increase in accessibility of health services among Thais, inequality and inequity in oral healthcare utilization persist even when the country achieved universal coverage. Decomposition analyses demonstrate the association of each determinant to inequality in utilization which provides information for policy amendment to achieve the goal of equity in healthcare system.
评估泰国全民覆盖(UC)政策在全国实施后,成年人口口腔保健利用方面与社会经济相关的(不)平等和横向(不)公平情况,并剖析利用不平等的根源。此外,确定影响口腔保健自付费用的决定因素。
使用2006年具有全国代表性的健康与福利调查以及社会经济调查中32748名15岁及以上泰国成年人的数据。本研究分别采用集中指数(CI)和横向不公平指数(HI)来衡量口腔保健利用方面与社会经济相关的不平等和横向不公平情况。此外,采用分解方法来确定不平等的根源,包括收入贡献、需求决定因素(即自我评估的口腔健康、人口特征)、非需求决定因素(即工作状态、教育程度、保险权益类型、地理特征和婚姻状况)以及残差项。使用两部分模型来确定影响口腔保健自付费用的因素。
CI(=0.199)和HI(=0.206)的显著正值表明,泰国人在口腔保健利用方面存在有利于富人的不平等和不公平情况。穷人更有可能在有补贴的公共机构(特别是社区医院)获得和使用服务,而富裕人群则倾向于在私立机构使用服务。收入和非需求决定因素主要导致公共部门利用方面有利于穷人的情况,与私立部门利用方面有利于富人的情况不同。需求因素占有利于穷人利用情况的大部分。上次就诊时接受的治疗类型和使用的保险是影响口腔保健自付费用的重要决定因素。
尽管全民覆盖政策在改善福利覆盖以及提高泰国人获得医疗服务的可及性方面取得了显著进展,但即使该国实现了全民覆盖,口腔保健利用方面的不平等和不公平现象仍然存在。分解分析表明了每个决定因素与利用不平等之间的关联,为政策修订提供了信息,以实现医疗保健系统公平的目标。