Schumacher G, Schmidt S C, Schlechtweg N, Roesch T, Sacchi M, von Dossow V, Chopra S S, Pratschke J, Zhukova J, Stieler J, Thuss-Patience P, Neuhaus P
Departments of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dis Esophagus. 2009;22(5):422-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2008.00923.x. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
Precise classification of cancers of the esophagogastric junction according to Siewert may be difficult for the presence of Barrett's esophagus or hiatal hernia, which subsequently leads to a difficult choice of the surgical procedure of esophagectomy or gastrectomy. Ninety-six patients with such cancers were operated on in our department in 7 years. Twenty-nine patients (30.2%), classified as type I (group 1), underwent a transthoracic esophagectomy with gastric pull up. Sixty-seven patients (69.8%) classified as type II or III (group 2) underwent an extended gastrectomy. We compared the patients of both groups retrospectively for disease-free survival and postoperative complications. The general performance status of most patients was comparable in both groups and was assigned to the American Society of Anesthesiologists class II or III. Statistically significant differences between the groups were seen for the postoperative reintubation rate [group 1: 31.0% vs. group 2: 9.0% (P = 0.009)], median time for surgery [group 1: 6 (3.5-8.5) hours vs. group 2: 4.7 (2.2-11.5) hours (P = 0.001)], time in the intensive care unit [group 1: 6 (3-85) days vs. group 2: 3 (1-54) days (P = 0.001)], median hospitalization time [group 1: 23 (14-105) days vs. group 2: 18 (10-63) days (P = 0.018)]. No statistical difference was observed for the recurrence-free survival of 40% after 3 years (P = 0.311), the mortality rate, the morbidity rate (P = 0.108), surgical and respiratory complications, and the incidence of anastomotic leakage (P = 0.645). We conclude that in selected cases it may be possible to perform an extended gastrectomy for small type I cancers.
由于存在巴雷特食管或食管裂孔疝,按照Siewert分类法对食管胃交界部癌进行精确分类可能会很困难,这随后导致在食管切除术或胃切除术的手术方式选择上存在困难。7年间,我科对96例此类癌症患者进行了手术。29例(30.2%)被归类为I型(第1组)的患者接受了经胸食管切除术并胃上提术。67例(69.8%)被归类为II型或III型(第2组)的患者接受了扩大胃切除术。我们对两组患者的无病生存期和术后并发症进行了回顾性比较。两组中大多数患者的一般身体状况相当,均属于美国麻醉医师协会II级或III级。两组之间在术后再次插管率[第1组:31.0% vs. 第2组:9.0%(P = 0.009)]、中位手术时间[第1组:6(3.5 - 8.5)小时 vs. 第2组:4.7(2.2 - 11.5)小时(P = 0.001)]、重症监护病房停留时间[第1组:6(3 - 85)天 vs. 第2组:3(1 - 54)天(P = 0.001)]、中位住院时间[第1组:23(14 - 105)天 vs. 第2组:18(10 - 63)天(P = 0.018)]方面存在统计学显著差异。3年后无复发生存率为40%,在死亡率、发病率(P = 0.108)、手术和呼吸并发症以及吻合口漏发生率(P = 0.645)方面未观察到统计学差异。我们得出结论,在某些特定病例中,对小型I型癌症进行扩大胃切除术可能是可行的。