Kocsis James H, Leon Andrew C, Markowitz John C, Manber Rachel, Arnow Bruce, Klein Daniel N, Thase Michael E
Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, N.Y., USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;70(3):354-61. doi: 10.4088/jcp.08m04371. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
Little is known about moderators of response to psychotherapy, medication, and combined treatment for chronic forms of major depressive disorder (MDD). We hypothesized that patient preference at baseline would interact with treatment group to differentially affect treatment outcome.
We report outcomes for 429 patients who participated in a randomized multicenter trial of nefazodone, Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP), or combination therapy for chronic forms of MDD (DSM-IV criteria) and who indicated their preference for type of treatment at study entry. The primary outcome measures were total scores on the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D-24) and categorical definitions of remission or partial response. The patients were recruited between June 1996 and December 1997.
There was an interactive effect of preference and treatment group on outcome. The treatment effect varied as a function of preference, and was particularly apparent for patients who initially expressed preference for one of the monotherapies. Patients who preferred medication had a higher remission rate (45.5%) and lower mean HAM-D-24 score (11.6) at study exit if they received medication than if they received psychotherapy (remission rate, 22.2%; mean HAM-D-24 score, 21.0). Patients who preferred psychotherapy had a higher remission rate (50.0%) and lower mean HAM-D-24 score (12.1) if they received psychotherapy than if they received medication (remission rate 7.7%, mean HAM-D-24 score 18.3). Nevertheless, treatment preference was not associated with risk of dropout from the study.
These results suggest that patient preference is a potent moderator of treatment response for patients with chronic forms of MDD; however, relatively low proportions of the patient sample preferred one of the monotherapies, participants were not blinded to treatment assignment, and there was no placebo group.
对于慢性重度抑郁症(MDD)的心理治疗、药物治疗及联合治疗的反应调节因素,人们了解甚少。我们假设基线时患者的偏好会与治疗组相互作用,从而对治疗结果产生不同影响。
我们报告了429例参与奈法唑酮、认知行为分析系统心理治疗(CBASP)或联合治疗慢性MDD(DSM-IV标准)随机多中心试验的患者的结果,这些患者在研究开始时表明了他们对治疗类型的偏好。主要结局指标为24项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D-24)总分以及缓解或部分缓解的分类定义。患者于1996年6月至1997年12月期间招募。
偏好与治疗组对结局存在交互作用。治疗效果因偏好而异,对于最初表示偏好单一疗法之一的患者尤为明显。偏好药物治疗的患者若接受药物治疗,在研究结束时的缓解率较高(45.5%),HAM-D-24平均得分较低(11.6),而接受心理治疗时缓解率为22.2%,HAM-D-24平均得分21.0。偏好心理治疗的患者若接受心理治疗,缓解率较高(50.0%),HAM-D-24平均得分较低(12.1),而接受药物治疗时缓解率为7.7%,HAM-D-24平均得分18.3。然而,治疗偏好与研究退出风险无关。
这些结果表明,患者偏好是慢性MDD患者治疗反应的一个有力调节因素;然而,患者样本中相对较低比例的人偏好单一疗法之一,参与者未对治疗分配进行盲法处理,且没有安慰剂组。