• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基线特征对针对持续性抑郁症门诊治疗的特定障碍认知行为分析心理治疗系统(CBASP)和支持性心理治疗效果的影响。

Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Effectiveness of Disorder-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Supportive Psychotherapy in Outpatient Treatment for Persistent Depressive Disorder.

作者信息

Serbanescu Ilinca, Backenstrass Matthias, Drost Sarah, Weber Bernd, Walter Henrik, Klein Jan Philipp, Zobel Ingo, Hautzinger Martin, Meister Ramona, Härter Martin, Schramm Elisabeth, Schoepf Dieter

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Institute of Clinical Psychology, Hospital Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 21;11:607300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607300. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607300
PMID:33408656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7779472/
Abstract

In the treatment of persistent depressive disorder (PDD), disorder-specific Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) has been shown to be superior to Supportive Psychotherapy (SP) in outpatients. It remains to clear which subgroups of patients benefit equally and differentially from both psychotherapies. To identify those patient-level baseline characteristics that predict a comparable treatment effectiveness of CBASP and SP and those that moderate the differential effectiveness of CBASP compared to SP. In this analysis of a 48-week multicenter randomized clinical trial comparing CBASP to SP in adult antidepressant-free outpatients with early-onset PDD, we evaluated baseline variables from the following domains as potential predictors and moderators of treatment effectiveness: socio-demography, clinical status, psychosocial and global functioning, life quality, interpersonal problems, childhood trauma, treatment history, preference for psychotherapy, and treatment expectancy. A 48-week treatment program with 32 sessions of either CBASP or SP. Depression severity measured by the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-24) at week 48. From = 268 randomized outpatients, = 209 completed the 48-week treatment program. CBASP completers had significantly lower post-treatment HRSD-24 scores than SP completers (mean=13.96, sd= 9.56; mean= 16.69, sd= 9.87; = 0.04). A poor response to both therapies was predicted by higher baseline levels of clinician-rated depression, elevated suicidality, comorbid anxiety, lower social functioning, higher social inhibition, moderate-to-severe early emotional or sexual abuse, no preference for psychotherapy, and the history of at least one previous inpatient treatment. Moderator analyses revealed that patients with higher baseline levels of self-rated depression, comorbidity of at least one Axis-I disorder, self-reported moderate-to-severe early emotional or physical neglect, or at least one previous antidepressant treatment, had a significantly lower post-treatment depression severity with CBASP compared to SP (all < 0.05). A complex multifactorial interaction between severe symptoms of depression, suicidality, and traumatic childhood experiences characterized by abuse, social inhibition, and anxiety may represent the basis of non-response to psychotherapy in patients with early onset PDD. Specific psychotherapy with CBASP might, however, be more effective and recommendable for a variety of particularly burdened patients compared to SP.

摘要

在持续性抑郁障碍(PDD)的治疗中,针对该障碍的认知行为分析心理治疗系统(CBASP)已被证明在门诊患者中优于支持性心理治疗(SP)。仍有待明确哪些患者亚组从这两种心理治疗中获益相同,哪些获益不同。以确定那些预测CBASP和SP具有可比治疗效果的患者层面基线特征,以及那些调节CBASP与SP相比的差异效果的特征。在这项对一项为期48周的多中心随机临床试验的分析中,该试验在无抗抑郁药治疗史的早发性PDD成年门诊患者中比较了CBASP和SP,我们评估了来自以下领域的基线变量,作为治疗效果的潜在预测因素和调节因素:社会人口统计学、临床状况、心理社会和整体功能、生活质量、人际问题、童年创伤、治疗史、对心理治疗的偏好以及治疗期望。进行一个为期48周、包含32节CBASP或SP治疗课程的治疗项目。在第48周时用24项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HRSD - 24)测量抑郁严重程度。从268名随机分组的门诊患者中,209名完成了为期48周的治疗项目。CBASP组完成治疗者治疗后的HRSD - 24评分显著低于SP组完成治疗者(均值 = 13.96,标准差 = 9.56;均值 = 16.69,标准差 = 9.87;P = 0.04)。临床医生评定的抑郁基线水平较高、自杀观念增强、共病焦虑、社会功能较低、社交抑制较高、中度至重度早期情感或性虐待、对心理治疗无偏好以及至少有一次先前住院治疗史可预测对两种治疗反应不佳。调节分析显示,自评抑郁基线水平较高、至少有一种轴I障碍共病、自我报告有中度至重度早期情感或身体忽视或至少有一次先前抗抑郁药治疗史的患者,与SP相比,接受CBASP治疗后抑郁严重程度显著更低(所有P < 0.05)。抑郁的严重症状、自杀观念以及以虐待、社交抑制和焦虑为特征的童年创伤经历之间复杂的多因素相互作用,可能代表了早发性PDD患者对心理治疗无反应的基础。然而,与SP相比,针对各种负担特别重的患者,使用CBASP进行特定心理治疗可能更有效且更值得推荐。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0347/7779472/701c3875b088/fpsyt-11-607300-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0347/7779472/701c3875b088/fpsyt-11-607300-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0347/7779472/701c3875b088/fpsyt-11-607300-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Baseline Characteristics on the Effectiveness of Disorder-Specific Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) and Supportive Psychotherapy in Outpatient Treatment for Persistent Depressive Disorder.基线特征对针对持续性抑郁症门诊治疗的特定障碍认知行为分析心理治疗系统(CBASP)和支持性心理治疗效果的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Dec 21;11:607300. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.607300. eCollection 2020.
2
Combining baseline characteristics to disentangle response differences to disorder-specific versus supportive psychotherapy in patients with persistent depressive disorder.结合基线特征,区分持续性抑郁障碍患者对特定障碍与支持性心理治疗的反应差异。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103512. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103512. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
3
Effect of Disorder-Specific vs Nonspecific Psychotherapy for Chronic Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.慢性抑郁症的特定障碍与非特定心理疗法的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3880.
4
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-based child maltreatment profiles to predict efficacy of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus non-specific psychotherapy in adults with early-onset chronic depression: cluster analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial.基于儿童创伤问卷的儿童虐待特征预测认知行为分析系统心理治疗与非特异性心理治疗对早发性慢性抑郁症成人疗效的影响:一项随机对照试验数据的聚类分析。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Sep;11(9):709-719. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00209-8.
5
Moderating effect of comorbid anxiety disorders on treatment outcome in a randomized controlled psychotherapy trial in early-onset persistently depressed outpatients.伴发焦虑障碍对早期起病持续抑郁门诊患者随机对照心理治疗试验中治疗结局的调节作用。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Oct;35(10):1001-1008. doi: 10.1002/da.22839. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
6
Identifying subgroups with differential response to CBASP versus Escitalopram during the first eight weeks of treatment in outpatients with persistent depressive disorder.识别在门诊持续性抑郁障碍患者中,在前 8 周治疗期间对 CBASP 与依地普仑有不同反应的亚组。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024 Apr;274(3):723-737. doi: 10.1007/s00406-023-01672-0. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
7
Group Cognitive Behavioural Analysis System of Psychotherapy (CBASP) for persistently depressed outpatients: a retrospective chart review.团体认知行为分析系统心理治疗(CBASP)治疗持续性抑郁门诊患者:回顾性图表分析。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;59(4):552-564. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12266. Epub 2020 Sep 13.
8
The Impact of Childhood Maltreatment on Long-Term Outcomes in Disorder-Specific vs. Nonspecific Psychotherapy for Chronic Depression.儿童期虐待对慢性抑郁症特定疾病与非特定疾病心理治疗长期结果的影响。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jul 1;272:152-157. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.164. Epub 2020 May 1.
9
Association of comorbid personality disorders with clinical characteristics and outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing two psychotherapies for early-onset persistent depressive disorder.在一项比较两种心理疗法治疗早发性持续性抑郁障碍的随机对照试验中,合并共病人格障碍与临床特征和结局的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.091. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
10
Two-Year Follow-Up after Treatment with the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for Early-Onset Chronic Depression.认知行为分析系统心理治疗与支持性心理治疗治疗早发性慢性抑郁症的两年随访结果。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(3):154-164. doi: 10.1159/000500189. Epub 2019 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
From antidepressants and psychotherapy to oxytocin, vagus nerve stimulation, ketamine and psychedelics: how established and novel treatments can improve social functioning in major depression.从抗抑郁药、心理治疗到催产素、迷走神经刺激、氯胺酮和迷幻剂:成熟及新型治疗方法如何改善重度抑郁症患者的社交功能。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 14;15:1372650. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1372650. eCollection 2024.
2
Psychological interventions for depression in children and adolescents: A bibliometric analysis.儿童和青少年抑郁症的心理干预:一项文献计量分析。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 19;14(3):467-483. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i3.467.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of dysthymia and persistent depressive disorder: history, correlates, and clinical implications.心境恶劣障碍与持续性抑郁障碍综述:历史、相关因素及临床意义
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Sep;7(9):801-812. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30099-7.
2
Combining baseline characteristics to disentangle response differences to disorder-specific versus supportive psychotherapy in patients with persistent depressive disorder.结合基线特征,区分持续性抑郁障碍患者对特定障碍与支持性心理治疗的反应差异。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103512. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103512. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
3
Two-Year Follow-Up after Treatment with the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy for Early-Onset Chronic Depression.
认知行为分析系统心理治疗与支持性心理治疗治疗早发性慢性抑郁症的两年随访结果。
Psychother Psychosom. 2019;88(3):154-164. doi: 10.1159/000500189. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Moderating effect of comorbid anxiety disorders on treatment outcome in a randomized controlled psychotherapy trial in early-onset persistently depressed outpatients.伴发焦虑障碍对早期起病持续抑郁门诊患者随机对照心理治疗试验中治疗结局的调节作用。
Depress Anxiety. 2018 Oct;35(10):1001-1008. doi: 10.1002/da.22839. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
5
Cognitive-Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy, Drug, or Their Combination for Persistent Depressive Disorder: Personalizing the Treatment Choice Using Individual Participant Data Network Metaregression.认知行为分析系统的心理治疗、药物或其组合对持续性抑郁障碍的治疗:使用个体参与者数据网络荟萃回归对治疗选择进行个体化。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(3):140-153. doi: 10.1159/000489227. Epub 2018 May 30.
6
Association of comorbid personality disorders with clinical characteristics and outcome in a randomized controlled trial comparing two psychotherapies for early-onset persistent depressive disorder.在一项比较两种心理疗法治疗早发性持续性抑郁障碍的随机对照试验中,合并共病人格障碍与临床特征和结局的关联。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Mar 15;229:262-268. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.12.091. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
7
Does Childhood Maltreatment Moderate the Effect of the Cognitive Behavioral Analysis System of Psychotherapy versus Supportive Psychotherapy in Persistent Depressive Disorder?童年期受虐经历是否会调节认知行为分析心理治疗系统与支持性心理治疗对持续性抑郁症的疗效差异?
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(1):46-48. doi: 10.1159/000484412. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
8
The Need for Research on Treatments of Chronic Depression.慢性抑郁症治疗研究的必要性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):242-243. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.4070.
9
Effect of Disorder-Specific vs Nonspecific Psychotherapy for Chronic Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.慢性抑郁症的特定障碍与非特定心理疗法的疗效比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Mar 1;74(3):233-242. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3880.
10
European Psychiatric Association Guidance on psychotherapy in chronic depression across Europe.欧洲精神医学协会关于欧洲慢性抑郁症心理治疗的指南。
Eur Psychiatry. 2016 Mar;33:18-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Feb 6.