Chen Zhiwen, Lu Gensheng, Li Xin, Li Xuemei, Fang Qiang, Ji Huixiang, Yan Junan, Zhou Zhansong, Pan Jinhong, Fu Weihua, Li Weibin, Xiong Enqing, Song Bo
Section of Urological Oncology, Urology Institute of People Liberation Army, Southwest Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Urology. 2009 Apr;73(4):838-43; discussion 843-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.09.076. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
To investigate, in a randomized controlled study, the degree of continence after the creation of orthotopic ileocolonic and ileal neobladders after cystectomy and to explore a possible mechanism for the difference in continence between these 2 types of orthotopic neobladder.
From 2003 to 2007, 71 male patients underwent orthotopic lower urinary tract reconstruction with either an ileocolonic or ileal neobladder after radical cystectomy. The degrees of continence and voiding patterns were individually evaluated using urodynamic examinations and a detailed patient questionnaire. The abnormal upper tract was evaluated using intravenous urography and ultrasonography.
Complete daytime continence was achieved in 90.9% and 89.4% of the patients and functional nocturnal continence 48.5% and 76.3% of patients in the ileocolonic neobladder and ileal neobladder groups, respectively. The urodynamic data showed that the initial volume of both the ileocolonic and the ileal neobladder appeared to not be significantly different statistically, although the compliance of the ileocolonic neobladder was lower than that of the ileal neobladder (P < .05). No difference was found in the parameters such as flow rate, urethral profile length, maximal urethral pressure, or neobladder neck pressure between the 2 neobladder types.
Although the ileocolonic and ileal neobladders can both achieve a large initial volume, the ileal neobladder has an advantage in the aspect of obtaining satisfactory nocturnal continence because of its greater compliance compared with that of the ileocolonic neobladder.
在一项随机对照研究中,调查膀胱切除术后原位回结肠新膀胱和回肠新膀胱形成后的控尿程度,并探讨这两种类型原位新膀胱控尿差异的可能机制。
2003年至2007年,71例男性患者在根治性膀胱切除术后接受了原位下尿路重建,采用回结肠新膀胱或回肠新膀胱。使用尿动力学检查和详细的患者问卷对控尿程度和排尿模式进行个体评估。使用静脉肾盂造影和超声检查评估上尿路异常情况。
回结肠新膀胱组和回肠新膀胱组分别有90.9%和89.4%的患者实现了完全白天控尿,48.5%和76.3%的患者实现了功能性夜间控尿。尿动力学数据显示,回结肠新膀胱和回肠新膀胱的初始容量在统计学上似乎没有显著差异,尽管回结肠新膀胱的顺应性低于回肠新膀胱(P <.05)。两种新膀胱类型在流速、尿道轮廓长度、最大尿道压力或新膀胱颈压力等参数方面没有差异。
虽然回结肠新膀胱和回肠新膀胱都能达到较大的初始容量,但回肠新膀胱在获得满意的夜间控尿方面具有优势,因为与回结肠新膀胱相比,其顺应性更高。