Ghose Geoffrey M
Dept. of Neuroscience and Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, 2021 6th St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55345, USA.
J Neurophysiol. 2009 Apr;101(4):2089-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.90654.2008. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
Although it is clear that sensory responses in the cortex can be strongly modulated by stimuli outside of classical receptive fields as well as by extraretinal signals such as attention and anticipation, the exact rules governing the neuronal integration of sensory and behavioral signals remain unclear. For example, most experiments studying sensory interactions have not explored attention, while most studies of attention have relied on the responses to relatively limited sets of stimuli. However, a recent study of V4 responses, in which location, orientation, and spatial attention were systematically varied, suggests that attention can both facilitate and suppress specific sensory inputs to a neuron according to behavioral relevance. To explore the implications of such input gain, we modeled the effects of a center-surround organization of attentional modulation using existing receptive field models of sensory integration. The model is consistent with behavioral measurements of a suppressive effect that surrounds the facilitatory locus of spatial attention. When this center-surround modulation is incorporated into realistic models of sensory integration, it is able to explain seemingly disparate observations of attentional effects in the neurophysiological literature, including spatial shifts in receptive field position and the preferential modulation of low contrast stimuli. The model is also consistent with recent formulations of attention to features in which gain is variably applied among cells with different receptive field properties. Consistent with functional imaging results, the model predicts that spatial attention effects will vary between different visual areas and suggests that attention may act through a common mechanism of selective and flexible gain throughout the visual system.
虽然很明显,皮层中的感觉反应可受到经典感受野之外的刺激以及诸如注意力和预期等视网膜外信号的强烈调制,但支配感觉信号与行为信号神经元整合的确切规则仍不清楚。例如,大多数研究感觉相互作用的实验并未探讨注意力,而大多数关于注意力的研究则依赖于对相对有限的一组刺激的反应。然而,最近一项对V4反应的研究系统地改变了位置、方向和空间注意力,结果表明注意力可以根据行为相关性促进和抑制神经元的特定感觉输入。为了探究这种输入增益的影响,我们使用现有的感觉整合感受野模型,对注意力调制的中心-外周组织效应进行了建模。该模型与空间注意力促进位点周围抑制效应的行为测量结果一致。当这种中心-外周调制被纳入感觉整合的现实模型时,它能够解释神经生理学文献中关于注意力效应的看似不同的观察结果,包括感受野位置的空间转移和低对比度刺激的优先调制。该模型也与最近关于特征注意力的表述一致,即在具有不同感受野特性的细胞之间可变地应用增益。与功能成像结果一致,该模型预测空间注意力效应在不同视觉区域之间会有所不同,并表明注意力可能通过整个视觉系统中选择性和灵活增益的共同机制起作用。