Auditory Modeling and Processing Laboratory, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology 106A FR and Institute for Hearing, Speech, and Language, Communications and Digital Signal Processing Center, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):234-7. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181976993.
Literature reviews of binaural loudness summation assume nearly perfect summation (i.e., a tone presented binaurally is assumed to be twice as loud as the same tone presented monaurally). However, some recent data and classroom demonstrations of this phenomenon using speech stimuli from a familiar visually present talker yield much less summation. Therefore, the following two hypotheses were tested using a preliminary procedure that controlled some, but not all, variables. First, the amount of binaural loudness summation is less for speech from a visually present talker than for recorded speech or tones. Second, the amount of binaural loudness summation is less when sounds are presented via loudspeakers than when sounds are presented via earphones.
Three types of stimuli (monitored live-voice [MLV] spondees, recorded spondees, and tones) were presented monaurally and binaurally across a wide range of levels. The same stimuli were presented via earphones and loudspeakers in an audiometric test booth. Eight young listeners with normal hearing judged the loudness of the stimuli using magnitude estimation.
The amount of binaural loudness summation was significantly less for MLV spondees than for tones or recorded spondees. Binaural loudness summation was also significantly less for loudspeaker presentation than for earphone presentation. Binaural loudness summation was found to be less than perfect (i.e., a sound presented binaurally is less than twice as loud as the same sound presented monaurally) for all conditions. The amount of binaural loudness summation was the least for MLV spondees presented via loudspeakers.
The present results support both hypotheses and indicate that binaural loudness summation in the loudspeaker conditions is significantly less than binaural loudness summation in typical laboratory test conditions using earphones. There may be a subjective effect resulting from expectations about loudness of a familiar, visually present talker, termed here as "Binaural Loudness Constancy."
双耳响度总和的文献综述假设近乎完美的总和(即,双耳呈现的音调被假定为单耳呈现的相同音调的两倍响)。然而,最近的一些数据和使用来自熟悉的可视说话者的言语刺激进行的这一现象的课堂演示得出的总和要小得多。因此,使用控制一些但不是全部变量的初步程序测试了以下两个假设。首先,与记录的语音或音调相比,来自可视说话者的语音的双耳响度总和较小。其次,当声音通过扬声器呈现时,与通过耳机呈现时相比,双耳响度总和较小。
三种类型的刺激(监测到的现场语音[MLV] 重读音节、记录的重读音节和音调)在广泛的水平上分别以单耳和双耳呈现。相同的刺激通过耳机和扬声器在听力测试亭中呈现。八名听力正常的年轻听众使用数量估计来判断刺激的响度。
MLV 重读音节的双耳响度总和明显小于音调或记录的重读音节。扬声器呈现时的双耳响度总和也明显小于耳机呈现时。对于所有条件,发现双耳响度总和都小于完美(即,双耳呈现的声音不如单耳呈现的相同声音响两倍)。扬声器呈现的 MLV 重读音节的双耳响度总和最小。
本研究结果支持这两个假设,并表明在扬声器条件下的双耳响度总和明显小于使用耳机的典型实验室测试条件下的双耳响度总和。可能存在一种与熟悉的可视说话者的响度有关的主观效应,在这里称为“双耳响度恒常性”。