Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Arthroplasty. 2010 Apr;25(3):392-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.01.013. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
This prospective randomized study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene articulation (CP). Fifty-six hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range, 19-56) each received uncemented components, a 28-mm alumina head with randomization of acetabular liner. Mean St Michael's outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median, 8 years; range, 1-10) was 22.8 and 22.9, respectively (P = .819). Wear was identified in all but 1 CP replacement, but only 12 of the 23 CC. Mean wear in the CP group was 0.11 mm/y and 0.02 mm/yr in the CC group (P < .001). Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group, there was no significant difference in midterm outcome between the 2 groups.
这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较氧化铝陶瓷-陶瓷(CC)关节与陶瓷对超高分子量聚乙烯关节(CP)的结果。55 名患者的 56 髋,平均年龄为 42.2(范围,19-56)岁,均接受非骨水泥组件、28mm 氧化铝头和髋臼衬垫的随机化。每组随访 10 年(中位数 8 年;范围 1-10 年)的平均 St Michael 结果评分分别为 22.8 和 22.9(P =.819)。除了 1 个 CP 置换外,所有病例均发现有磨损,但仅在 23 个 CC 中有 12 个。CP 组的平均磨损为 0.11mm/y,CC 组为 0.02mm/yr(P <.001)。除了聚乙烯组的磨损明显更大外,两组在中期结果方面没有显著差异。