• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

精神分裂症患者转换为每日一次的富马酸喹硫平延长释放片后生活质量和药物费用的变化。

Quality of life and drug costs associated with switching antipsychotic medication to once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in patients with schizophrenia.

机构信息

AstraZeneca AB, Mölndal, Sweden.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Mar;25(3):709-16. doi: 10.1185/03007990902738810.

DOI:10.1185/03007990902738810
PMID:19196221
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess the quality of life and drug costs associated with switching from any ongoing antipsychotic treatment to once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate (quetiapine XR) in patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This assessment was based on data collected during a 12-week study in patients with schizophrenia (n = 477) who switched from their current antipsychotic due to insufficient efficacy or poor tolerability to a flexible dose of quetiapine XR. Patients were assigned utilities based on their Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and the presence of adverse events by applying the methods of Lenert et al.1. Quality adjusted life year (QALY) gains were calculated assuming a linear change of utility between two consecutive visits. Incremental costs were calculated by comparing the hypothetical mean drug cost (assuming patients stay on previous treatment) with the actual mean cost of quetiapine XR based on European prices.

RESULTS

Patients who completed the study (n = 279) increased their average utility by 0.116, corresponding to a QALY gain of 0.0207. For the total sample, the mean utility increased by 0.09, reflecting a QALY gain of 0.0170. The additional costs for quetiapine XR per QALY gained varied from approximately 16,000 euro to 24,000 euro. Notably, this is a non-comparative study; therefore, no conclusions can be reached regarding the relative impact of switching to quetiapine XR compared with other antipsychotics. Further limitations included the short trial duration on which the utility estimates are based, and the restriction of cost data to drug costs alone. Furthermore, in a 'real world' scenario, it is to be expected that other drug regimens might be introduced during periods of treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

This analysis demonstrates that patients with schizophrenia who switch their antipsychotic medication to quetiapine XR because of insufficient efficacy or poor tolerability benefit from significant QALY gains at a reasonable increase in drug cost.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估精神分裂症患者由当前抗精神病药物切换至每日一次的富马酸喹硫平缓释片(quetiapine XR)治疗后的生活质量和药物费用。

方法

本评估基于一项为期 12 周的研究数据,该研究纳入了 477 例因疗效不足或不耐受而切换至富马酸喹硫平 XR 灵活剂量的精神分裂症患者。根据阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)评分和不良反应的存在,应用 Lenert 等人的方法为患者分配效用值。假设效用值在两次连续就诊之间呈线性变化,计算出质量调整生命年(QALY)的获益。通过比较假设患者继续使用之前治疗方案的平均药物成本与基于欧洲价格的富马酸喹硫平 XR 的实际平均成本,计算出增量成本。

结果

完成研究的患者(n=279)平均效用提高了 0.116,相当于 QALY 增加 0.0207。对于整个样本,平均效用提高了 0.09,反映出 QALY 增加 0.0170。每获得一个 QALY 增加的富马酸喹硫平 XR 额外成本约为 16000 至 24000 欧元。值得注意的是,这是一项非比较性研究;因此,无法就与其他抗精神病药物相比切换至富马酸喹硫平 XR 的相对影响得出结论。进一步的局限性包括基于效用估计的试验持续时间较短,以及成本数据仅限于药物成本。此外,在“现实世界”场景中,预计在治疗失败期间可能会引入其他药物治疗方案。

结论

本分析表明,因疗效不足或不耐受而将抗精神病药物切换为富马酸喹硫平 XR 的精神分裂症患者,在药物成本略有增加的情况下,可获得显著的 QALY 获益。

相似文献

1
Quality of life and drug costs associated with switching antipsychotic medication to once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者转换为每日一次的富马酸喹硫平延长释放片后生活质量和药物费用的变化。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Mar;25(3):709-16. doi: 10.1185/03007990902738810.
2
The efficacy and safety of once-daily quetiapine extended release in patients with schizophrenia switched from other antipsychotics: an open-label study in Chinese population.从其他抗精神病药物转换而来的精神分裂症患者每日一次服用喹硫平缓释片的疗效和安全性:一项针对中国人群的开放标签研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Jan 22;15:1. doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0378-5.
3
Switching from other antipsychotics to once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者从其他抗精神病药物转换为每日一次的富马酸喹硫平缓释剂治疗。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2008 Jan;24(1):21-32. doi: 10.1185/030079908x253384.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in acute schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.富马酸喹硫平缓释片每日一次治疗急性精神分裂症的疗效和耐受性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;68(6):832-42. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v68n0603.
5
Cost effectiveness of adjunctive quetiapine fumarate extended-release tablets with mood stabilizers in the maintenance treatment of bipolar I disorder.喹硫平富马酸盐缓释片联合心境稳定剂辅助治疗双相 I 型障碍维持治疗的成本效果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(9):751-64. doi: 10.2165/11538350-000000000-00000.
6
Evaluation of the feasibility of switching from immediate release quetiapine to extended release quetiapine fumarate in stable outpatients with schizophrenia.对稳定期精神分裂症门诊患者从速释喹硫平转换为富马酸喹硫平缓释片的可行性评估。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008 Mar;23(2):95-105. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e3282f2d42c.
7
The long-term clinical benefit and effectiveness of switching to once-daily quetiapine extended release in patients with schizophrenia.将每日多次服用喹硫平缓释片改为每日一次对精神分裂症患者的长期临床获益和疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Mar;29(3):227-39. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.762903. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
8
Annual cost of relapses and relapse-related hospitalizations in adults with schizophrenia: results from a 12-month, double-blind, comparative study of lurasidone vs quetiapine extended-release.精神分裂症成人患者复发及复发相关住院的年度费用:为期 12 个月的、双盲、比较研究中卢拉西酮与喹硫平缓释片的结果。
J Med Econ. 2013 Aug;16(8):987-96. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2013.809353. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
9
Cost of antipsychotic polypharmacy in the treatment of schizophrenia.抗精神病药物联合治疗精神分裂症的成本
BMC Psychiatry. 2008 Apr 4;8:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-19.
10
The efficacy and tolerability of once-daily extended release quetiapine fumarate in hospitalized patients with acute schizophrenia: a 6-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.一日一次富马酸喹硫平缓释片治疗急性精神分裂症住院患者的疗效和耐受性:一项为期6周的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2008;41(3):11-35.

引用本文的文献

1
Long-term health-related quality of life improvements among patients treated with lurasidone: results from the open-label extension of a switch trial in schizophrenia.使用鲁拉西酮治疗的患者长期健康相关生活质量改善情况:精神分裂症转换试验开放标签扩展研究的结果
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jun 1;16:176. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0879-5.
2
An economic evaluation of a contingency-management intervention for stimulant use among community mental health patients with serious mental illness.针对患有严重精神疾病的社区心理健康患者使用兴奋剂情况的应急管理干预措施的经济评估。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Aug 1;153:293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 May 14.
3
Systematic Literature Review of the Methods Used to Compare Newer Second-Generation Agents for the Management of Schizophrenia: A focus on Health Technology Assessment.
用于比较新型第二代药物治疗精神分裂症方法的系统文献综述:聚焦于卫生技术评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Oct;33(10):1049-67. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0285-8.
4
The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.精神障碍成本效用分析中效用权重的评估:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Dec;31(12):1131-54. doi: 10.1007/s40273-013-0107-9.
5
Antipsychotic adherence, switching, and health care service utilization among Medicaid recipients with schizophrenia.患有精神分裂症的医疗补助受助者的抗精神病药物依从性、换药情况及医疗服务利用情况
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2010 Jul 21;4:263-71. doi: 10.2147/ppa.s6053.