Suppr超能文献

牙科领域基于网络的虚拟患者:影响Web-SP系统中病例使用的因素。

Web-based virtual patients in dentistry: factors influencing the use of cases in the Web-SP system.

作者信息

Zary N, Johnson G, Fors U

机构信息

Virtual Patient Lab, Karolinska Institute, Berzelius väg 3, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Dent Educ. 2009 Feb;13(1):2-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0579.2007.00470.x.

Abstract

We studied the students' acceptance and utilization of virtual patients (VPs) authored by faculty using the Web-SP system over two consecutive years. We also studied factors of importance for the utilization of VPs for self-assessment. Both year-groups studied found the Web-SP system easy to use and their overall opinion of Web-SP was positive (Median: 5, p25-p75: 4-5). They found the VPs engaging, realistic, fun to use, instructive and relevant to their course. Students used, on average, 9.68 VPs per course, which constitutes 43 percent of the available VPs. The number of VPs available seemed to be sufficient for the target course, even if some of the students preferred a higher number of VPs. Of the VPs encountered, 71% (CI: 68-75%) were VPs with feedback, and correspondingly 29% of the VPs chosen were without feedback. The difference in utilization between both types of VPs was significant, at p < 0.001. Thus, the students clearly favoured VPs with feedback compared to VPs without feedback. There were three modes of engagement in which the VP was utilized. Mode 1 was the preferred mode for VPs without feedback, while mode 3 was dominant for VPs with feedback.. Whether or not a VP was selected for review during a teacher led seminar or not, did not affect student behaviour, at least on the surface. Teacher led seminars may still be of importance to provide credibility to the VPs by integrating them into the curriculum.

摘要

我们连续两年研究了学生对教师使用Web-SP系统创作的虚拟病人(VPs)的接受度和使用情况。我们还研究了对利用虚拟病人进行自我评估具有重要意义的因素。两个年级的学生都认为Web-SP系统易于使用,他们对Web-SP的总体评价是积极的(中位数:5,第25百分位数-第75百分位数:4-5)。他们发现虚拟病人引人入胜、逼真、使用有趣、具有启发性且与课程相关。学生每门课程平均使用9.68个虚拟病人,占可用虚拟病人的43%。即使有些学生希望有更多的虚拟病人,但可用的虚拟病人数量似乎对目标课程来说是足够的。在遇到的虚拟病人中,71%(置信区间:68%-75%)是有反馈的虚拟病人,相应地,选择的虚拟病人中有29%没有反馈。两种类型的虚拟病人在使用情况上的差异显著,p<0.001。因此,与没有反馈的虚拟病人相比,学生明显更喜欢有反馈的虚拟病人。虚拟病人有三种使用模式。模式1是没有反馈的虚拟病人的首选模式,而模式3是有反馈的虚拟病人的主导模式。在教师主导的研讨会上是否选择虚拟病人进行复习,至少从表面上看,并不影响学生的行为。教师主导的研讨会可能仍然很重要,通过将虚拟病人纳入课程来提高其可信度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验