Education and Development Research Team, Warwick Medical School, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Aug 1;12:62. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-62.
Virtual Patients (VPs) are web-based representations of realistic clinical cases. They are proposed as being an optimal method for teaching clinical reasoning skills. International standards exist which define precisely what constitutes a VP. There are multiple design possibilities for VPs, however there is little formal evidence to support individual design features. The purpose of this trial is to explore the effect of two different potentially important design features on clinical reasoning skills and the student experience. These are the branching case pathways (present or absent) and structured clinical reasoning feedback (present or absent).
METHODS/DESIGN: This is a multi-centre randomised 2 x 2 factorial design study evaluating two independent variables of VP design, branching (present or absent), and structured clinical reasoning feedback (present or absent).The study will be carried out in medical student volunteers in one year group from three university medical schools in the United Kingdom, Warwick, Keele and Birmingham. There are four core musculoskeletal topics. Each case can be designed in four different ways, equating to 16 VPs required for the research. Students will be randomised to four groups, completing the four VP topics in the same order, but with each group exposed to a different VP design sequentially. All students will be exposed to the four designs. Primary outcomes are performance for each case design in a standardized fifteen item clinical reasoning assessment, integrated into each VP, which is identical for each topic. Additionally a 15-item self-reported evaluation is completed for each VP, based on a widely used EViP tool. Student patterns of use of the VPs will be recorded.In one centre, formative clinical and examination performance will be recorded, along with a self reported pre and post-intervention reasoning score, the DTI. Our power calculations indicate a sample size of 112 is required for both primary outcomes.
This trial will provide robust evidence to support the effectiveness of different designs of virtual patients, based on student performance and evaluation. The cases and all learning materials will be open access and available on a Creative Commons Attribution-Share-Alike license.
虚拟患者(VP)是基于网络的真实临床病例的代表。它们被提议作为教授临床推理技能的最佳方法。目前存在国际标准,明确规定了什么构成 VP。VP 有多种设计可能性,但是很少有正式的证据支持个别设计特征。本试验的目的是探索两种不同的潜在重要设计特征对临床推理技能和学生体验的影响。这是分支病例途径(存在或不存在)和结构化临床推理反馈(存在或不存在)。
方法/设计:这是一项多中心随机 2x2 析因设计研究,评估 VP 设计的两个独立变量,分支(存在或不存在)和结构化临床推理反馈(存在或不存在)。该研究将在英国三所大学医学院的一年制医学生志愿者中进行,包括华威、基尔和伯明翰。有四个核心肌肉骨骼主题。每个案例可以设计成四种不同的方式,总共需要 16 个 VP 进行研究。学生将随机分为四组,按相同顺序完成四个 VP 主题,但每个组依次接触不同的 VP 设计。所有学生都将接触到所有四种设计。主要结果是在标准化的十五项临床推理评估中,每个案例设计的表现,每个主题都有一个相同的评估。此外,还将根据广泛使用的 EViP 工具,为每个 VP 完成十五项自我报告评估。将记录学生使用 VP 的模式。在一个中心,将记录形成性临床和考试表现,以及自我报告的干预前后推理评分,DTI。我们的计算能力表明,两个主要结果都需要 112 名样本。
本试验将根据学生的表现和评估,提供有力的证据支持不同设计的虚拟患者的有效性。案例和所有学习材料都将开放获取,并在知识共享署名-相同方式共享许可下提供。