Suppr超能文献

患者对药剂师咨询服务的需求及满意度:自动处方发放系统与常规取药柜台的比较

Patient request for pharmacist counseling and satisfaction: Automated prescription delivery system versus regular pick-up counter.

作者信息

Hirsch Jan D, Oen Austin, Robertson Suzie, Nguyen Nancy, Daniels Charles

机构信息

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093-0714, USA.

出版信息

J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2009 Jan-Feb;49(1):73-7. doi: 10.1331/JAPhA.2009.08037.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the rate of patient-requested pharmacist counseling for refill prescriptions and satisfaction with pick-up process for patients using an automated prescription delivery system (APDS) versus those using a regular pick-up counter and to explore patient willingness to use an APDS as a tool for pharmacist monitoring of medication therapy outcomes.

METHODS

In this uncontrolled, cross-sectional, survey study, we assessed use of APDS or the regular counter by 116 patients picking up refill prescriptions at two community pharmacies. The main outcome measures were number of patients requesting pharmacist counseling for refill prescriptions, patient satisfaction with pick-up process, and patient willingness to use an APDS to report medication therapy outcomes.

RESULTS

None of the regular counter users and only two APDS users (3.7%) requested counseling for their refill prescription (P = 0.126). Almost all patients agreed that they were able to talk to a pharmacist about their prescription if they wanted to do so (95.1% regular counter and 92.3% APDS; P = 0.268). The majority (75%) of patients using APDS indicated that they would be willing to use the system to answer questions or perform simple tests to provide information that the pharmacist could use to improve medication effectiveness or reduce adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

Very few patients (ADPS or regular counter) asked to speak to a pharmacist about their refill medications, although it appeared that no perceived barriers to pharmacist access existed. Most APDS patients were willing to use this new technology to provide information about therapy outcomes to the pharmacist. Further exploration and testing of the APDS as a data collection tool to enhance pharmacist access to therapy outcomes is warranted.

摘要

目的

评估使用自动处方传递系统(APDS)的患者与在常规取药柜台取药的患者对于续方要求药剂师咨询的比例以及对取药过程的满意度,并探讨患者使用APDS作为药剂师监测药物治疗效果工具的意愿。

方法

在这项非对照、横断面调查研究中,我们评估了在两家社区药房取续方的116名患者使用APDS或常规柜台的情况。主要结局指标为续方要求药剂师咨询的患者数量、患者对取药过程的满意度以及患者使用APDS报告药物治疗效果的意愿。

结果

常规柜台取药的患者中无人要求对其续方进行咨询,而只有两名APDS用户(3.7%)提出了咨询要求(P = 0.126)。几乎所有患者都表示,如果他们愿意,能够就自己的处方与药剂师交谈(常规柜台取药患者为95.1%,APDS用户为92.3%;P = 0.268)。使用APDS的患者中大多数(75%)表示愿意使用该系统回答问题或进行简单测试,以提供信息帮助药剂师提高药物疗效或减少不良反应。

结论

极少有患者(使用APDS或常规柜台取药的患者)要求就其续方与药剂师交谈,尽管似乎不存在与药剂师沟通的明显障碍。大多数使用APDS的患者愿意使用这项新技术向药剂师提供治疗效果信息。有必要进一步探索和测试将APDS作为一种数据收集工具,以增强药剂师获取治疗效果信息的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验