Vetter Richard S, Hinkle Nancy C, Ames Lisa M
Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
J Med Entomol. 2009 Jan;46(1):15-20. doi: 10.1603/033.046.0103.
Georgia is on the southeastern margin of the native range of the brown recluse spider, Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch and Mulaik. The brown recluse is not a common Georgia spider and has limited distribution in the state. Using recent submissions, previously published records, and examination of museum specimens, we document the spider's presence in 31 (19.5%) of Georgia's 159 counties, with almost all being found in the northern portion. The spider was collected almost exclusively north of the Fall Line (a transition zone separating the Piedmont and the Coastal Plain geological provinces). Only two locations in the southern Coastal Plain province produced L. reclusa specimens; these southern finds are considered spiders that were transported outside their range. There were six finds of the non-native world tramp species, L. rufescens (Dufour), three south of the Fall Line. In conspicuous contrast, over a 5-yr period, a Georgia poison center database recorded 963 reports of brown recluse spider bites from 103 counties. These figures greatly outnumber the historic verifications of brown recluses in the state for both specimen quantity and county occurrence, indicating improbable spider involvement and the overdiagnosis of bites. In the southern half of the state, medical diagnoses of brown recluse spider bites have virtually zero probability of being correct. Bite diagnoses should be made with caution in north Georgia given the spider's spotty distribution with low frequency of occurrence.
佐治亚州位于褐皮隐居蛛(Loxosceles reclusa Gertsch and Mulaik)原生分布范围的东南边缘。褐皮隐居蛛在佐治亚州并非常见蜘蛛,其分布范围有限。利用近期提交的数据、先前发表的记录以及对博物馆标本的检查,我们记录了该蜘蛛在佐治亚州159个县中的31个县(占19.5%)有出现,几乎所有发现都在该州北部。这种蜘蛛几乎只在瀑布线以北被采集到(瀑布线是皮埃蒙特和沿海平原地质省份的过渡区)。在南部沿海平原省份只有两个地点采集到了褐皮隐居蛛标本;这些在南部的发现被认为是被运出其分布范围的蜘蛛。有6次发现了非本地的世界性流浪物种红褐隐居蛛(L. rufescens (Dufour)),其中3次在瀑布线以南。与之形成显著对比的是,在5年时间里,佐治亚州一个中毒控制中心数据库记录了来自103个县的963起褐皮隐居蛛咬伤报告。这些数字在标本数量和涉及的县数量上都大大超过了该州褐皮隐居蛛的历史核实记录,这表明蜘蛛涉咬的可能性不大,且咬伤被过度诊断。在该州南部,褐皮隐居蛛咬伤的医学诊断几乎不可能正确。鉴于这种蜘蛛分布零散且出现频率低,在佐治亚州北部进行咬伤诊断时应谨慎。