Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, 143 747.
Environ Monit Assess. 2010 Feb;161(1-4):295-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-009-0746-7. Epub 2009 Feb 6.
In this work, the experimental compatibility between the standard DNPH-HPLC method and the gas chromatographic (GC) method (without any derivatization) was investigated for the analysis of atmospheric carbonyls. In the latter case, GC analysis was made based on adsorptive enrichment on solid sorbents followed by thermal desorption. For a comparative analysis between the two methods, we quantified the concentration levels of acetaldehyde from gaseous combustion samples of different charcoal products. The acetaldehyde concentration data, measured by the HPLC method (643 +/- 1,689 ppb), were approximately 10% lower than the GC-based method (722 +/- 1,788 ppb). As such, the differences in the measured concentrations were statistically insignificant. Although the percentage difference of the two methods fell within a relatively wide range, the results obtained by the GC-based method were comparable to those of the HPLC method with significantly strong correlations. The GC-based method, if tested for certain carbonyl species such as acetaldehyde, appeared to be a suitable alternative for the HPLC method.
在这项工作中,研究了标准 DNPH-HPLC 方法与气相色谱(GC)方法(无需衍生化)在分析大气羰基化合物方面的实验兼容性。在后一种情况下,GC 分析基于固体吸附剂上的吸附富集,然后进行热解吸。为了对两种方法进行比较分析,我们定量了不同木炭产品的气体燃烧样品中乙醛的浓度水平。通过 HPLC 方法(643 +/- 1,689 ppb)测量的乙醛浓度数据比基于 GC 的方法(722 +/- 1,788 ppb)低约 10%。因此,测量浓度的差异在统计学上并不显著。尽管两种方法的百分比差异处于相对较宽的范围内,但基于 GC 的方法的结果与 HPLC 方法相当,具有显著的强相关性。如果针对某些羰基化合物(如乙醛)对基于 GC 的方法进行测试,它似乎是 HPLC 方法的合适替代方法。