Pal Raktim, Kim Ki-Hyun
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
J Sep Sci. 2007 Nov;30(16):2708-18. doi: 10.1002/jssc.200700206.
The analysis of carbonyls in ambient air has received a great deal of scientific attention with the advancement of analytical techniques and increased demand for the build-up of its data base. In this review article, we have attempted to provide some insight into the relative performance of different instrumental approaches available for the analysis of ambient carbonyls with a major emphasis on high performance liquid chromatographic and gas chromatographic methods. Reported in several international standard procedures, derivatization of carbonyls with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH) with either an impinger or cartridges is the most commonly used method of HPLC detection. In this respect, a number of alternative hydrazine reagents have also been discussed for use with HPLC. In contrast, GC methods based on the combined application of adsorptive enrichment on solid sorbents and thermal desorption are examined with regard to their suitability for carbonyl analysis in air. Particular emphasis has been directed towards the advantages and drawbacks of these different instrumental techniques for ambient carbonyls. Based on this comparative approach, we discuss the suitability for each method for carbonyl analysis.
随着分析技术的进步以及对其数据库建立需求的增加,环境空气中羰基化合物的分析受到了大量科学关注。在这篇综述文章中,我们试图深入了解可用于分析环境羰基化合物的不同仪器方法的相对性能,主要侧重于高效液相色谱法和气相色谱法。在一些国际标准程序中报道,使用冲击式吸收管或柱盒,用2,4 -二硝基苯肼(2,4 - DNPH)对羰基化合物进行衍生化是高效液相色谱检测最常用的方法。在这方面,还讨论了一些可与高效液相色谱联用的替代肼试剂。相比之下,基于在固体吸附剂上进行吸附富集和热脱附相结合应用的气相色谱方法,针对其在空气中羰基分析的适用性进行了研究。特别强调了这些不同仪器技术用于环境羰基分析的优缺点。基于这种比较方法,我们讨论了每种方法对羰基分析的适用性。