Zhang Liwen, Bai Zhipeng, You Yan, Wu Jianhui, Feng Yinchang, Zhu Tan
College of Environmental Science and Engineer, Nankai University, TianJin 300071, China.
Chemosphere. 2009 Apr;75(4):453-61. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.12.063. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are with great environmental concerns due to their toxic, mutagenic, and carcinogenic properties. The harmful effects caused by PAHs emitted from indoor sources may be more direct and serious. In this study, PAHs in aerosol from two typical indoor sources, the cooking fume (CF) and environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) were collected by simulation emission in a chamber. Eighteen PAHs were analyzed by GC/MS and GC/C/IRMS. The chemical profiles of these two sources were described. Results indicated that Fluoranthene, Pyrene and Fluorene in CF, and Fluorene, Phenanthrene, Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene and Benz(a)anthracene in ETS, relative quantity of which were variable in a smaller range, can be regarded as tracers of indoor PAHs sources. There are distinct differences among the ratios of Benz(a)anthracene/Chrysene, Benzo(e)pyrene/Benzo(a)pyrene and Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene/Benzo(g,h,i)perylene between CF and EST. Distribution of delta(13)C of individual PAHs in ETS samples ranged from -21.76 per thousand to -29.32 per thousand, wider than that in CF samples (-22.94 per thousand to -28.39 per thousand). The delta(13)C of Phenanthrene, Benz(a)anthracene, Benzo(b)fluoranthene, Benzo(k)fluoranthene and Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene between these two sources showed great differences. The (13)C was enriched in low molecule weight compounds of CF samples and in high molecule weight compounds of ETS samples.
多环芳烃(PAHs)因其毒性、致突变性和致癌性而备受环境关注。室内源排放的PAHs所造成的有害影响可能更为直接和严重。在本研究中,通过在室内模拟排放,收集了来自烹饪油烟(CF)和环境烟草烟雾(ETS)这两种典型室内源的气溶胶中的PAHs。采用气相色谱/质谱联用仪(GC/MS)和气相色谱/燃烧/同位素比值质谱联用仪(GC/C/IRMS)分析了18种PAHs。描述了这两种源的化学特征。结果表明,CF中的荧蒽、芘和芴,以及ETS中的芴、菲、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘和苯并[a]蒽,其相对含量在较小范围内变化,可被视为室内PAHs源的示踪物。CF和ETS之间苯并[a]蒽/ Chrysene、苯并[e]芘/苯并[a]芘和茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘/苯并[g,h,i]苝的比值存在明显差异。ETS样品中单个PAHs的δ(13)C分布范围为-21.76‰至-29.32‰,比CF样品(-22.94‰至-28.39‰)更宽。这两种源之间菲、苯并[a]蒽、苯并[b]荧蒽、苯并[k]荧蒽和茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘的δ(13)C差异很大。CF样品的低分子量化合物中(13)C富集,而ETS样品的高分子量化合物中(13)C富集。