Pitcher David, Charles Lucie, Devlin Joseph T, Walsh Vincent, Duchaine Bradley
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive, Perceptual, and Brain Sciences, University College London, UK.
Curr Biol. 2009 Feb 24;19(4):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.007. Epub 2009 Feb 5.
Neuroscientists have long debated whether focal brain regions perform specific cognitive functions [1-5], and the issue remains central to a current debate about visual object recognition. The distributed view of cortical function suggests that object discrimination depends on dispersed but functionally overlapping representations spread across visual cortex [6-8]. The modular view claims different categories of objects are discriminated in functionally segregated and specialized cortical areas [9-11]. To test these competing theories, we delivered transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over three adjacent functionally localized areas in extrastriate cortex. In three experiments, participants performed discrimination tasks involving faces, bodies, and objects while TMS was delivered over the right occipital face area (rOFA) [12], the right extrastriate body area (rEBA) [13], or the right lateral occipital area (rLO) [14]. All three experiments showed a task selective dissociation with performance impaired only by stimulation at the site selective for that category: TMS over rOFA impaired discrimination of faces but not objects or bodies; TMS over rEBA impaired discrimination of bodies but not faces or objects; TMS over rLO impaired discrimination of objects but not faces or bodies. The results support a modular account in which category-selective areas contribute solely to discrimination of their preferred categories.
长期以来,神经科学家一直在争论大脑局部区域是否执行特定的认知功能[1 - 5],而这个问题仍然是当前关于视觉物体识别辩论的核心。皮质功能的分布式观点认为,物体辨别取决于分布在视觉皮质上但功能重叠的分散表征[6 - 8]。模块化观点则声称,不同类别的物体在功能上分离且专门化的皮质区域中被辨别[9 - 11]。为了检验这些相互竞争的理论,我们在纹外皮质的三个相邻功能定位区域施加了经颅磁刺激(TMS)。在三个实验中,参与者在执行涉及面部、身体和物体的辨别任务时,TMS分别施加于右侧枕叶面部区域(rOFA)[12]、右侧纹外身体区域(rEBA)[13]或右侧枕叶外侧区域(rLO)[14]。所有三个实验都显示出任务选择性分离,即仅在对该类别有选择性的部位进行刺激时,表现才会受损:对rOFA施加TMS会损害对面部的辨别,但不会损害对物体或身体的辨别;对rEBA施加TMS会损害对身体的辨别,但不会损害对面部或物体的辨别;对rLO施加TMS会损害对物体的辨别,但不会损害对面部或身体的辨别。结果支持了模块化观点,即类别选择性区域仅对其偏好类别的辨别起作用。