Berry Emily, Matthews Kellie S, Singh Diljeet K, Buttin Barbara M, Lurain John R, Alvarez Ronald D, Schink Julian
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-466, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2009 Apr;113(1):63-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.12.035. Epub 2009 Feb 7.
To assess the feasibility, associated toxicities, and reasons for early cessation of an outpatient intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy regimen for treatment of advanced ovarian cancer following optimal cytoreductive surgery.
Between January 2006 and December 2007, 42 patients with stages IIC-IV epithelial ovarian, tubal, or primary peritoneal cancer who had residual disease <1 cm after cytoreductive surgery were treated with an outpatient IP chemotherapy protocol. Patients received intravenous (IV) docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and IP cisplatin 75-100 mg/m(2) on day 1, followed by IP paclitaxel 60 mg/m(2) on day 8, with the intent to treat patients every 21 days for 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Charts were abstracted for demographic, chemotherapy, and toxicity-related data.
The median age of the 42 patients was 59 years (range 33-70) and the majority of patients had epithelial ovarian cancer (80%), FIGO stage IIIC (83%), and papillary serous histology (74%). Of an intended 252 IP chemotherapy cycles, 172 (68%) were administered. Twenty-nine patients (69%) completed >or=4 cycles and 12 (29%) received all 6 IP cycles. Common grade 3/4 toxicities by patient included neutropenia (43%), infection (21.5%), and gastrointestinal effects (14%). There was one treatment-related death. Reasons for discontinuation were largely chemotherapy (43%) or port (37%) related.
With supportive measures, such as scheduled hydration and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, outpatient administration of IP chemotherapy was feasible. This regimen resulted in few hospitalizations or treatment delays and demonstrated less toxicity than previously reported IP chemotherapy regimens. Port-related complications were a leading cause of IP chemotherapy discontinuation.
评估在进行最佳细胞减灭术后,门诊腹腔内(IP)化疗方案治疗晚期卵巢癌的可行性、相关毒性以及早期停药原因。
2006年1月至2007年12月期间,42例IIC-IV期上皮性卵巢癌、输卵管癌或原发性腹膜癌患者在细胞减灭术后残留病灶<1 cm,接受门诊IP化疗方案治疗。患者在第1天接受静脉注射(IV)多西他赛75 mg/m²和顺铂75-100 mg/m²腹腔内注射,随后在第8天接受腹腔内注射紫杉醇60 mg/m²,计划每21天治疗1次,共进行6个周期化疗。提取病历中的人口统计学、化疗和毒性相关数据。
42例患者的中位年龄为59岁(范围33-70岁),大多数患者患有上皮性卵巢癌(80%)、国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)IIIC期(83%)和乳头状浆液性组织学类型(74%)。计划进行的252个IP化疗周期中,172个(68%)得以实施。29例患者(69%)完成了≥4个周期,12例(29%)接受了全部6个IP周期。患者常见的3/4级毒性包括中性粒细胞减少(43%)、感染(21.5%)和胃肠道反应(14%)。有1例与治疗相关的死亡。停药原因主要与化疗(43%)或端口(37%)相关。
通过诸如定期补液和粒细胞集落刺激因子等支持措施,门诊IP化疗是可行的。该方案导致的住院或治疗延迟较少,且毒性低于先前报道的IP化疗方案。与端口相关的并发症是IP化疗停药的主要原因。