Fink Philip W, Kelso J A Scott, Jirsa Viktor K
Center for Complex Systems and Brain Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431, USA.
J Mot Behav. 2009 Mar;41(2):147-57. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.41.2.147-157.
One difference between the excitator model and other theoretical models of coordination is the mechanism of discrete movement initiation. In addition to an imperative signal common to all discrete movement initiation, the excitator model proposes that movements are initiated when a threshold element in state space, the so-called separatrix, is crossed as a consequence of stimulation or random fluctuations. The existence of a separatrix predicts that false starts will be caused by mechanical perturbations and that they depend on the perturbation's direction. The authors tested this prediction in a reaction-time task to an auditory stimulus. Participants applied perturbations in the direction of motion (i.e., index finger flexion) or opposed to the motion prior to the stimulus on 1/4 of the trials. The authors found false starts in 34% and 9% of trials following flexion perturbations and extension perturbations, respectively, as compared with only 2% of trials without perturbations, confirming a unique prediction of the excitator model.
兴奋子模型与其他协调理论模型的一个区别在于离散运动启动的机制。除了所有离散运动启动共有的指令信号外,兴奋子模型提出,当状态空间中的一个阈值元素(即所谓的分界线)由于刺激或随机波动而被跨越时,运动就会启动。分界线的存在预示着错误启动将由机械扰动引起,并且它们取决于扰动的方向。作者在对听觉刺激的反应时任务中测试了这一预测。在四分之一的试验中,参与者在刺激之前沿运动方向(即食指弯曲)或与运动方向相反地施加扰动。作者发现,与无扰动试验中仅2%相比,在弯曲扰动和伸展扰动后的试验中,分别有34%和9%出现了错误启动,证实了兴奋子模型的一个独特预测。