Chapko M K
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
J Public Health Dent. 1991 Summer;51(3):144-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1991.tb02205.x.
Dentists can be divided into five adoption categories based upon their time of adoption of pit and fissure sealants: innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. The differences among dentists in the five adoption categories were examined for four classes of variables: practice characteristics, dentist characteristics, communication of information, and practice environment. Questionnaires were mailed in September 1984 to a random sample (N = 521) of Washington State dentists in general practices. A total of 376 completed questionnaires were returned, for a response rate of 72 percent. Adoption of sealants proceeded as follows: 5 percent of dentists through 1973, 24 percent through 1979, 50 percent through 1982, and 75 percent through 1984. Adoption category was related to percent of assistants who were certified, delegation to assistants and hygienists, magnitude of the fees charged by the practice, number of staff meetings per month, the dentist having been an officer in a dental organization, year the dentist adopted other new technologies, dentist's self-rating of willingness to try new things, percent of patients who are children, and percent of the dentist's colleagues who used sealants. These data lend some support to the two-stage or opinion-leader model of diffusion and suggest that new technologies can be promoted by first influencing dentists who consistently adopt early.
根据采用窝沟封闭剂的时间,牙医可分为五类:创新者、早期采用者、早期多数、晚期多数和落后者。针对五类采用者的牙医,研究了四类变量的差异:执业特征、牙医特征、信息传播以及执业环境。1984年9月,向华盛顿州普通执业牙医的随机样本(N = 521)邮寄了调查问卷。共收到376份完整问卷,回复率为72%。窝沟封闭剂的采用情况如下:截至1973年,5%的牙医采用;截至1979年,24%的牙医采用;截至1982年,50%的牙医采用;截至1984年,75%的牙医采用。采用类别与以下因素有关:获得认证的助理百分比、向助理和口腔保健员的授权、诊所收取的费用规模、每月员工会议次数、牙医曾在牙科组织担任官员、牙医采用其他新技术的年份、牙医对尝试新事物的自我评估、儿童患者百分比以及使用窝沟封闭剂的牙医同事百分比。这些数据为两阶段或意见领袖传播模型提供了一些支持,并表明通过首先影响一贯早期采用的牙医,可以推广新技术。