Petráková K, Nenutil R, Grell P, Fabian P, Zichová I, Svoboda M, Palácová M, Vyzula R
Klinika Komplexní Onkologické Péce, Masarykův Onkologický Ustav, Brno.
Klin Onkol. 2008;21(5):303-8.
The latest clinical trials indicate better performance of aromatase inhibitors, compared to tamoxifen, in adjuvant hormonotherapy of breast carcinoma. The identification of molecular markers, predicting resistance to tamoxifen, could help to identify patients, which are most likely to benefit from aromatase inhibitors in up-front adjuvant hormonotherapy.
Tissue microarrays were constructed from archival paraffin blocks of primary tumors of 179 patients with estrogen receptor positive operable breast carcinoma in stage I-III, subsequently treated with tamoxifen for five years or until relapse, with at least 7 years follow up available. The amplifications of Her-2 and cyclin D1 genes were evaluated by fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The level of progesterone receptor (PR) and Ki67 were estimated by immunohistochemistry.
54 of above patients recurred during follow up. In univariate analysis of disease free survival, the presence of more than three nodal metastases (RR=4,5 p<0,001), grade 3 (RR=2,3 p=0,035), cyclin D1 (RR=3,06 p<0,001) and Her-2 (RR=3,06 p<0,001) amplifications were identified as significant risk factors, together with the negativity of PR (RR=2,1 p=0,013). In multivariate analysis, only clinical stage III (RR=2,6 p=0,003), cyclin D1 (RR=2,7 p=0,001) and Her-2 (RR=2,1 p=0,014) amplifications proved significant. In 77 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy no statistically significant risk factor was identified. In multivariate analysis of 102 patients without adjuvant chemotherapy only stage III (RR=6,9 p=0,001) and Her-2 amplification (RR=4,5 p=0,001) were confirmed.
The advanced clinical stage, cyclin D1 and Her-2 gene amplifications represent factors, predicting the failure of adjuvant tamoxifen treatment, but their predictive value is much lower in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. This fact indicates, they can reflect the common biological aggressiveness of tumor and need not to be tamoxifen specific.
最新临床试验表明,在乳腺癌辅助激素治疗中,芳香化酶抑制剂的疗效优于他莫昔芬。识别预测他莫昔芬耐药的分子标志物,有助于确定哪些患者最有可能从一线辅助激素治疗中的芳香化酶抑制剂治疗中获益。
组织芯片由179例I-III期雌激素受体阳性可手术乳腺癌原发肿瘤的存档石蜡块构建而成,这些患者随后接受了5年他莫昔芬治疗或直至复发,随访时间至少7年。通过荧光原位杂交评估Her-2和细胞周期蛋白D1基因的扩增情况。通过免疫组化评估孕激素受体(PR)和Ki67的水平。
上述患者中有54例在随访期间复发。在无病生存期的单因素分析中,发现三个以上淋巴结转移(RR=4.5,p<0.001)、3级(RR=2.3,p=0.035)、细胞周期蛋白D1(RR=3.06,p<0.001)和Her-2(RR=3.06,p<0.001)扩增以及PR阴性(RR=2.1,p=0.013)为显著危险因素。在多因素分析中,仅临床III期(RR=2.6,p=0.003)、细胞周期蛋白D1(RR=2.7,p=0.001)和Her-2(RR=2.1,p=0.014)扩增被证明具有显著性。在77例接受辅助化疗的患者中,未发现具有统计学意义的危险因素。在对102例未接受辅助化疗的患者进行多因素分析时,仅III期(RR=6.9,p=0.001)和Her-2扩增(RR=4.5,p=0.001)得到确认。
临床分期较晚、细胞周期蛋白D1和Her-2基因扩增是预测辅助他莫昔芬治疗失败的因素,但在接受辅助化疗的患者中其预测价值要低得多。这一事实表明,它们可反映肿瘤常见的生物学侵袭性,不一定是他莫昔芬特异性的。