• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2].

作者信息

Hu Yong, He Xian-feng, Ma Wei-hu, Xu Rong-ming, Ruan Yong-ping, Feng Jian-xian, Yang Shu-hua

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, the 6th Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Jan;22(1):17-20.

PMID:19203027
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the screw pull-out strength of posterior C2 when the screw is fixed to C2 through the trans-pedicle or lateral mass or trans-laminar unicortically or bicortically,so as to provide biomechanical basis for the clinical application of posterior C2 screw fixation technique.

METHODS

The pedicle screw,the lateral mass screw or the laminar screw was separately anchored into 30 fresh C2 specimens unicortically or bicortically. The screw pull-out strength of different fixation was tested and compared with the others.

RESULTS

The average pull-out strength of C2 bicortical pedicle screw was (1255.8 +/- 381.9) N, the strongest during all the methods. The mean pull-out strength of C2 unicortical pedicle screw, C2 bicortical lateral mass screw and C2 bicortical laminar screw were (901.8 +/- 373.3) N, (776.1 +/- 306.8) N and (640.8 +/- 302.9) N respectively,with no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screw should be the first choice for the posterior fixation on axis. C2 lateral mass screw fixation and C2 laminar screw fixation can be another supplement choice and the screw had better be placed bicortically.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2].
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Jan;22(1):17-20.
2
Biomechanical comparison of four C1 to C2 rigid fixative techniques: anterior transarticular, posterior transarticular, C1 to C2 pedicle, and C1 to C2 intralaminar screws.四种C1至C2刚性固定技术的生物力学比较:前路经关节、后路经关节、C1至C2椎弓根以及C1至C2椎板间螺钉。
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):516-21; discussion 516-21. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197222.05299.31.
3
Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.两级颈椎锁定后路螺钉/棒与钩/棒技术的生物力学比较
Spine J. 2007 Mar-Apr;7(2):194-204. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.015. Epub 2006 Dec 22.
4
[Biomechanical evaluation of three-dimensional stability of anterior approach screw fixation through C2 vertebral body to C1 lateral mass].经C2椎体至C1侧块前路螺钉固定三维稳定性的生物力学评估
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2008 May;21(5):353-5.
5
[A static mechanical comparison between two transarticular internal fixation techniques in the lower cervical spine].[下颈椎两种经关节内固定技术的静态力学比较]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2007 Jun 19;87(23):1599-602.
6
Biomechanical comparison of unicortical versus bicortical C1 lateral mass screw fixation.单皮质与双皮质C1侧块螺钉固定的生物力学比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Oct;20(7):505-8. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318031af8b.
7
Biomechanical comparison of cervical transfacet pedicle screws versus pedicle screws.颈椎经关节突椎弓根螺钉与椎弓根螺钉的生物力学比较
Chin Med J (Engl). 2008 Aug 5;121(15):1390-3.
8
[Biomechanical study on the posterior screw fixation in the lower cervical spine].下颈椎后路螺钉固定的生物力学研究
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2011 Jun;24(6):530-3.
9
[Choice of bone cement augmentation techniques when sacral pedicle screw loosening].[骶椎椎弓根螺钉松动时骨水泥强化技术的选择]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Feb;24(2):211-4.
10
C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.C1椎弓根螺钉与C1侧块螺钉:拔出强度和生物力学稳定性的比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Feb 15;34(4):371-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318193a21b.