Suppr超能文献

[Comparison study of biomechanical test among fixation techniques of three types screw of posterior approach for C2].

作者信息

Hu Yong, He Xian-feng, Ma Wei-hu, Xu Rong-ming, Ruan Yong-ping, Feng Jian-xian, Yang Shu-hua

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, the 6th Hospital of Ningbo, Ningbo 315040, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Jan;22(1):17-20.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the screw pull-out strength of posterior C2 when the screw is fixed to C2 through the trans-pedicle or lateral mass or trans-laminar unicortically or bicortically,so as to provide biomechanical basis for the clinical application of posterior C2 screw fixation technique.

METHODS

The pedicle screw,the lateral mass screw or the laminar screw was separately anchored into 30 fresh C2 specimens unicortically or bicortically. The screw pull-out strength of different fixation was tested and compared with the others.

RESULTS

The average pull-out strength of C2 bicortical pedicle screw was (1255.8 +/- 381.9) N, the strongest during all the methods. The mean pull-out strength of C2 unicortical pedicle screw, C2 bicortical lateral mass screw and C2 bicortical laminar screw were (901.8 +/- 373.3) N, (776.1 +/- 306.8) N and (640.8 +/- 302.9) N respectively,with no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

Pedicle screw should be the first choice for the posterior fixation on axis. C2 lateral mass screw fixation and C2 laminar screw fixation can be another supplement choice and the screw had better be placed bicortically.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验