Suppr超能文献

20毫克奥美拉唑胶囊在24名健康韩国男性志愿者中的药代动力学和生物等效性

Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of 20 mg omeprazole capsule in 24 healthy Korean male volunteers.

作者信息

Rhim S-Y, Park J-H, Park Y-S, Lee M-H, Hwang K-G, Kim Y-S, Shaw L M, Lee Y-S, Kang J-S

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Hanyang University, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Jan;47(1):23-9. doi: 10.5414/cpp47023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A randomized, two-way, crossover bioequivalence study in 24 healthy Korean male volunteers was conducted to compare bioequivalence of two brands of 20 mg omeprazole capsules, Hutex omeprazole (Hutex Pharm Co. Korea) as a test and Yuhan Losec (Yuhan Co. Ltd., Korea) as a reference drug.

VOLUNTEERS AND METHODS

Subjects were administered single dosage of 1 capsule of 20 mg of each formulation with 240 ml of water after 10 hs overnight fasting on 2 treatment days separated by one-week washout period. After dosing, serial blood sampling was held during 9 hs. Plasma was analyzed for omeprazole by a validated HPLC method with ultraviolet detection in the range of 10 approximately 1,000 ng/ml with the lowest limit of quantification of 10 ng/ml.

RESULTS

Several pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined from the plasma samples, and data from reference and test formulations in the plasma were represented such as AUC0-t (1,223.3 vs 1,284.3 ng x h/ml), [formula in text](1,311.1 vs 1,410.0 ng x h/ml), Cmax (598.7 vs 598.1 ng/ml), tmax (1.9 vs 1.9 h), t1/2 (1.3 vs 1.4 h) and Ke (0.67 vs 0.67 h-1), respectively. AUC0-t, [formula in text] and Cmax were tested for bioequivalence after log-transformation of plasma data. PK parameters with 90% confidence interval (CI) of test/reference ratio based on ANOVA analysis were 0.961 approximately 1.135 for AUC0-t, 0.968 approximately 1.144 for [formula in text] and 0.951 approximately 1.117 for Cmax.

CONCLUSIONS

PK parameters with 90% CI were within the bioequivalence range of 80 - 125% of FDA statistical limit. Therefore, both omeprazole formulations were bioequivalent during fasting state in these healthy Korean male volunteers.

摘要

目的

在24名健康韩国男性志愿者中进行了一项随机、双向、交叉生物等效性研究,以比较两种品牌的20毫克奥美拉唑胶囊的生物等效性,其中Hutex奥美拉唑(韩国Hutex制药公司)为受试药物,韩国韩宇洛赛克(韩宇有限公司)为参比药物。

志愿者与方法

受试者在经过一周洗脱期的两个治疗日,隔夜禁食10小时后,用240毫升水送服每种制剂的1粒20毫克胶囊。给药后,在9小时内进行系列采血。采用经过验证的高效液相色谱法(HPLC),在10至1000纳克/毫升范围内进行紫外检测,最低定量限为10纳克/毫升,对血浆中的奥美拉唑进行分析。

结果

从血浆样本中确定了几个药代动力学(PK)参数,并列出了血浆中参比制剂和受试制剂的数据,如AUC0-t(1223.3对1284.3纳克·小时/毫升)、[文中公式](1311.1对1410.0纳克·小时/毫升)、Cmax(598.7对598.1纳克/毫升)、tmax(1.9对1.9小时)、t1/2(1.3对1.4小时)和Ke(0.67对0.67小时-1)。对血浆数据进行对数转换后,对AUC0-t、[文中公式]和Cmax进行生物等效性检验。基于方差分析(ANOVA)分析的受试/参比比值的90%置信区间(CI)的PK参数,AUC0-t为0.961至1.135,[文中公式]为0.968至1.144,Cmax为0.951至1.117。

结论

90%CI的PK参数在FDA统计限度的80%-125%的生物等效性范围内。因此,在这些健康韩国男性志愿者的禁食状态下,两种奥美拉唑制剂具有生物等效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验