Samanen J, Cash T, Narindray D, Brandeis E, Adams W, Weideman H, Yellin T, Regoli D
Department of Peptidomimetic Research, Smith Kline Beecham Pharmaceuticals, Research and Development, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406-0939.
J Med Chem. 1991 Oct;34(10):3036-43. doi: 10.1021/jm00114a012.
To probe the receptor-bound conformational requirements of angiotensin II (ANG II) octapeptide agonists and antagonists, the synthesis and biological activities of [Sar1]ANG II agonist and [Sar1,X8]ANG II antagonist analogues (X8 = Ile, D-Phe, or Aib) bearing conformational constraints in positions 3, 5, and 7 were investigated and compared with previous literature efforts. The conformational constraints that were examined include Pro, Dtc (5,5-dimethylthiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid), Aib, Cle, (NMe)Ala, (NMe)Ile, and the lactam modification, L,L-lactam-Phe, previously described by Freidinger et al. (J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 104-109). Both [Sar1,(NMe)Ala3 and Pro3]ANG II retained agonist activity, while only [Sar1,(NMe)Ala3,Ile8]ANG II retained antagonist activity. [Sar1,Dtc5]ANG II displayed superior agonist activity, while both [Sar1,Dtc5 and Cle5,Ile8] ANG II displayed superior antagonist activity. In contrast to position 5, Dtc7 substitution for Pro7 of either [Sar1]ANG II or [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II gave analogues with reduced activities. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that conformations of [Sar1]ANG II and [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II containing a C7 conformation in position 7 are preferred for both ANG II agonist and antagonist activity. Incorporation of the L,L-lactam-Phe modification into [Sar1]ANG II gives a pure ANG II antagonist (pA2 8.3), comparable to saralasin (pA2 8.6). In positions 3, 5, and 7 the conformational requirements for the ANG II agonist [Sar1]ANG II and the ANG II antagonist [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II may be different. Individual substitution of (NMe)Ala3, Dtc5, D-Phe8 and Aib8 [[Sar1,Aib8]ANG II: Khosla et al. J. Med. Chem. 1977, 20, 1051-1055] into [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II gives analogues that retain antagonist activity. Multiple substitutions of these types of residues into [Sar1,Ile8]ANG II gives analogue 45 [Sar1,(NMe)Ala3,Dtc5,Aib8]ANG II, 46 [Sar1(NMe)Ala3,D-Phe8]AII, and 47 [Sar1,Dtc5,D-Phe8]AII, which display considerably reduced antagonist activity. In ANG II antagonists the construction of highly constrained analogues may not be possible by the additive substitution of "preferred" constrained amino acids into a single analogue.
为探究血管紧张素II(ANG II)八肽激动剂和拮抗剂与受体结合的构象要求,研究了在第3、5和7位带有构象限制的[Sar1]ANG II激动剂和[Sar1,X8]ANG II拮抗剂类似物(X8 = Ile、D-Phe或Aib)的合成及生物活性,并与先前的文献研究结果进行了比较。所研究的构象限制包括Pro、Dtc(5,5-二甲基噻唑烷-4-羧酸)、Aib、Cle、(NMe)Ala、(NMe)Ile以及内酰胺修饰L,L-内酰胺-Phe,后者先前由Freidinger等人描述(《有机化学杂志》,1982年,47卷,104 - 109页)。[Sar1,(NMe)Ala3和Pro3]ANG II均保留激动剂活性,而只有[Sar1,(NMe)Ala3,Ile8]ANG II保留拮抗剂活性。[Sar1,Dtc5]ANG II表现出卓越的激动剂活性,而[Sar1,Dtc5和Cle5,Ile8]ANG II均表现出卓越的拮抗剂活性。与第5位相反,用Dtc7取代[Sar1]ANG II或[Sar1,Ile8]ANG II的Pro7得到的类似物活性降低。这些结果与以下假设一致:在第7位含有C7构象的[Sar1]ANG II和[Sar1,Ile8]ANG II构象对于ANG II激动剂和拮抗剂活性均较为有利。将L,L-内酰胺-Phe修饰引入[Sar1]ANG II可得到一种纯ANG II拮抗剂(pA2 8.3),与沙拉新(pA2 8.6)相当。在第3、5和7位,ANG II激动剂[Sar1]ANG II和ANG II拮抗剂[Sar1,Ile8]ANG II的构象要求可能不同。将(NMe)Ala3、Dtc5、D-Phe8和Aib8 [[Sar1,Aib8]ANG II:Khosla等人,《药物化学杂志》,1977年,20卷,1051 - 1055页]逐个取代[Sar1,Ile8]ANG II可得到保留拮抗剂活性的类似物。将这些类型的残基多次取代引入[Sar1,Ile8]ANG II可得到类似物45 [Sar1,(NMe)Ala3,Dtc5,Aib8]ANG II、46 [Sar1(NMe)Ala3,D-Phe8]AII和47 [Sar1,Dtc5,D-Phe8]AII,它们的拮抗剂活性显著降低。在ANG II拮抗剂中,通过将“优选的”受限氨基酸逐个添加取代到单个类似物中来构建高度受限的类似物可能是不可行的。